Benefits of energy efficiency policies in Thailand: an ex-ante evaluation of the energy efficiency action plan

Abstract

The paper presents the results of an ex-ante evaluation of the economy-wide benefits that may be achieved through the implementation of the 20-year Energy Efficiency Action Plan (EEAP) in Thailand. The objective of the EEAP is to reduce energy intensity by 25 % in 2030 compared to 2010. This is to be reached by reducing the projected energy consumption by 20 % or 38 Mtoe until 2030. We have specified an analytical framework, which allows for a calculation of the overall energy cost savings, energy import cost reductions and reduced CO 2 emissions. Moreover, we calculated the induced energy efficiency investments, employment effects and impacts on governmental budget. The evaluation shows that an effective implementation of the plan may lead to a reduction in energy expenditure of 37.7 billion EUR by 2030. Moreover, the EEAP-induced energy savings will significantly reduce the greenhouse gas emissions as well as Thailand's energy import costs and generate private investment in energy efficiency of about 5 billion EUR annually in 2030, which in turn may lead to about 300,000 new jobs. The size of the net impact of the plan on Thailand's governmental budget is uncertain due to positive and negative effects on corporate and income tax revenues, expenses for unemployment benefits, governmental energy consumption, expenses for energy subsidies and energy tax income.

Measuring multiple impacts of low-carbon energy options in a green economy context

“…The purpose of these projects was to quantify the co-benefits related to various energy efficiency measures (see, e.g. Suerkemper et al [35], Suerkemper et al [36], Urge-Vorsatz et al [37], Tirado Herrero et al [27]). During these research projects more and more challenges and pitfalls were gradually recognised, often at the cost of making mistakes in initial project phases.Finding solutions to these challenges have sometimes taken significant efforts by the experts, and much discussion among the researchers.…”

The Life Cycle Assessment of an Energy‐Positive Peri‐Urban Residence in a Tropical Regime

“…Urbanization is often paired with higher levels of disposable income, which may correlate with greater household‐based energy consumption. Citing data from Thailand's Energy Policy and Planning Office, Suerkemper and colleagues () note that per capita final energy consumption in Thailand has increased from 0.39 tonnes oil equivalent per person (toe/person) to 0.96 toe/person between 1990 and 2013. With Thailand's current primary energy supply mix consisting of approximately 80% fossil fuels, reducing energy consumption to help achieve energy security is paramount, and low‐energy consuming residences are key to the effort (EGAT ; Chirarattananon et al.…”

What did we recently learn about the evaluation of energy efficiency policies and programmes? Insights from IEPPEC 2014 in Berlin

“…Last but not least, other papers presented at the Berlin conference have been developed by their authors to be published in journals (Braungardt et al, 2016 ;De Schepper et al, 2015 ;Nauleau, 2014 ;Quitzow, 2015 ;Rietbergen et al, 2016 ;Smedby, 2016 ;Suerkemper et al, 2015). This is also a good indicator about the quality of the conference proceedings.…”