2018
DOI: 10.5603/cj.a2017.0127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benefits of laboratory personalized antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Abstract: Background: The preventive effects of laboratory personalized antiplatelet therapy (PAPT) strategy including genetic detection and platelet function testing (PFT) on major adverse cardiac events (MACEs (RR 0.60, p = 0.008) and myocardial infarctions (RR 0.43, p = 0.02) compared to the non-PAPT group. No statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding cardiovascular death (RR 0.77, p = 0.21), bleeding events (RR 0.96, p = 0.59) and ischemic stroke (RR 0.81; p = 0.57). The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, high on-aspirin platelet reactivity has been described, frequently associated with HcPR. Although controversial, high on treatment platelet reactivity seems to be associated with increased CV risk (D'Ascenzo et al, 2014;Fiolaki et al, 2017;Lin et al, 2015;Wisman et al, 2014), whereas personalized antiplatelet therapy, based on genetic and PLT function tests, is increasingly emerging as a potential preventive strategy (Zhang et al, 2017). Finally, PLT products might have a role in patient risk stratification for both primary and secondary CV prevention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, high on-aspirin platelet reactivity has been described, frequently associated with HcPR. Although controversial, high on treatment platelet reactivity seems to be associated with increased CV risk (D'Ascenzo et al, 2014;Fiolaki et al, 2017;Lin et al, 2015;Wisman et al, 2014), whereas personalized antiplatelet therapy, based on genetic and PLT function tests, is increasingly emerging as a potential preventive strategy (Zhang et al, 2017). Finally, PLT products might have a role in patient risk stratification for both primary and secondary CV prevention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in line with other studies dealing with personalized antiplatelet therapy in cardiology patients. [30][31][32] In particular, the use of platelet function testing to deescalate antiplatelet therapy and avoid bleeding complications in hyperresponders seems to be a reasonable and promising approach. 33,34 Furthermore, platelet function test might be helpful to determine the optimum timing of elective and urgent coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery Editorial after P2Y12 inhibitor cessation, in order to minimize bleeding complications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%