Overcoming the negative feelings of patients and their families toward healthcare professionals is critical to resolving medical accident disputes in Japan. To address this issue, a medical mediation model for conflict resolution has been developed and training has been provided. However, it is not studied how those who have completed the training perceive the model in the medical field. Therefore, we conducted a survey on this point. Fifty consenting participants from across Japan were asked to answer 13 questions. Each item was rated on a scale of 1 (no need at all) to 10 (need is essential). At the same time, respondents were asked to indicate whether or not they practice medical mediation. The group that answered that they were practicing was divided into "P" group (n=28) and the group that answered that they were not practicing into "No P" group (n=21), and the Wilcoxon test was used to compare the evaluation scores. In question 2 (Satisfaction with medical mediation education), the P group was 4.68 (mean) ± 2.29 (standard deviation) compared to 3.24 ± 1.81 for the No P group, a significant difference. In the other items, both groups scored 6 or more points. The items with higher scores in the P group and significant differences were six items. They were informed consent support, cognitive conflict resolution, and need for mediation education. These results show that there are differences in perceptions of medical mediation between practitioners and non-practitioners of medical mediation. The need for medical mediation education was also inferred. The study suggests the need to ensure the quality of medical mediation by providing continuing medical mediation education.