1982
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19820901)50:5<845::aid-cncr2820500507>3.0.co;2-s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benefits of polychemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell bronchogenic carcinoma

Abstract: The benefits of polychemotherapy in advanced (Stage III) non‐small‐cell bronchogenic carcinoma remain uncertain. In attempt to answer the important question whether treatment improves well‐being and survival in these patients, we did a prospective, randomized, single‐blind study to compare polychemotherapy to a placebo. Thirty‐nine consecutive patients were enrolled. Twenty received a drug combination consisting of: methotrexate, doxorubicine hydrochloride (Adriamycin), cyclophosphamide, and lomustine (CCNU) (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
2

Year Published

1985
1985
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Objective responses were seen in 18% of chemotherapy patients, but there were no significant differences (P = 0.32) in overall survival (median survival, 19.9 weeks chemotherapy vs 14.4 weeks no chemotherapy). The only randomised study, other than that of Rapp et al, to show a survival advantage for chemotherapy over a policy of no chemotherapy is that of Cormier et al (1982). The conclusions of this study are open to discussion since it was very small (only 39 patients) and the no treatment group had a particularly short survival (median 8.5 weeks).…”
Section: Patient Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Objective responses were seen in 18% of chemotherapy patients, but there were no significant differences (P = 0.32) in overall survival (median survival, 19.9 weeks chemotherapy vs 14.4 weeks no chemotherapy). The only randomised study, other than that of Rapp et al, to show a survival advantage for chemotherapy over a policy of no chemotherapy is that of Cormier et al (1982). The conclusions of this study are open to discussion since it was very small (only 39 patients) and the no treatment group had a particularly short survival (median 8.5 weeks).…”
Section: Patient Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When this study was instituted only one small randomised study has shown a survival advantage for combination chemotherapy (MACC) over no chemotherapy (Cormier et al, 1982). Because of the need to define clearly the therapeutic potential of platinum based chemotherapy, separate but almost identical randomised trials were begun in Australia and in Southampton, UK.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An update of an earlier trial (Williams et al, 1988) has shown a trend towards improved survival, and several new trials have shown a small but significant survival benefit for patients receiving chemotherapy compared to control groups receiving symptomatic management alone (Cormier et al, 1982;Rapp et al, 1988). Moreover, there have been reports of chemotherapy leading to significant palliation and improvement in overall quality of life in patients with NSCLC (Cullen et al, 1988;Folman & Rosman, 1988).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of recent trials have shown a survival benefit for combination chemotherapy over best supportive care (Cormier et al, 1982;Rapp et al, 1988;Cartei et al, 1993) and a recent overview analysis confirmed a significant, although modest, survival benefit in favour of chemotherapy (Souquet et al, 1993). No one regimen has been shown to be superior to others in terms of survival in the treatment of advanced NSCLC, although cisplatin-based regimens appear to offer the best response rates (Veronesi et al, 1988;Luedke et al, 1990).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%