2008
DOI: 10.2478/v10078-008-0015-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benefits of Sleep in Motor Learning – Prospects and Limitations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
33
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the experiment was spread over 2 days to avoid excessive fatigue in the participants. There is extensive evidence of the enhancing effect of sleep on for example sequential finger tapping, although there is less evidence of a significant effect on for example pursuit tracking [20]. In any case, future experiments should be counterbalanced, with separate days for training, benchmarking and shared control.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the experiment was spread over 2 days to avoid excessive fatigue in the participants. There is extensive evidence of the enhancing effect of sleep on for example sequential finger tapping, although there is less evidence of a significant effect on for example pursuit tracking [20]. In any case, future experiments should be counterbalanced, with separate days for training, benchmarking and shared control.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…between Post1 and Pre2, and between Post2 and Pre3) did not result in statistically significant increases in performance for either group (t-tests, p>0.05), suggesting there were no delayed off-line gains in performance between sessions, however, on an individual level some participants exhibited off-line learning: Cued group –2 participants out of 8; Uncued group –3 participants out of 7. Note, however, that for test measurement only two trials were averaged, this could impair our ability to reveal delayed gains in the speed of performance (such as in [36]) due to warm-up decrements in the first trial after daytime retention intervals (and consistent with [37]). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several explanations may account for this. First, appearance of warm-up decrements after daytime retention intervals along with low number of trials averaged (two) could impair our ability to reveal delayed gains in speed of performance (consistent with [37]). Second, due to the similarity of the finger-tapping task to standard keyboard usage, executing a key press takes so little time that inter-key gaps are likely to reflect exclusively the underlying control mechanisms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Earlier attempts at demonstrating sleep-related offline learning for motor tasks different from finger-tapping, for the most part came to nothing (Blischke et al, 2008). It was concluded, however, that at least certain gross motor tasks might be amenable to sleep-related EC, as long as they were sequentially structured, spatially defined, and explicitly acquired.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%