2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benefits of thinning and burning for understory diversity vary with spatial scale and time since treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, Kerns and Day ), while others report sustained richness improvements over unburned stands (Webster and Halpern , Rossman et al. ). Overall, it appears that the impact of MPB outbreak on burning treatments in this study did not modify the understory vegetation compared with the untreated stands, but MPB outbreak did negatively interact with overstory structure and composition in the control and burn‐only treatments by killing many of the ponderosa pines up to 55 cm dbh.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, Kerns and Day ), while others report sustained richness improvements over unburned stands (Webster and Halpern , Rossman et al. ). Overall, it appears that the impact of MPB outbreak on burning treatments in this study did not modify the understory vegetation compared with the untreated stands, but MPB outbreak did negatively interact with overstory structure and composition in the control and burn‐only treatments by killing many of the ponderosa pines up to 55 cm dbh.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Douglas-fir sapling growth in the post-treatment growth period increased crown fire hazard by reducing the gap between surface and canopy fuels (this study and Crotteau et al 2018b), and if not tended soon, saplings will resist future lowintensity prescribed fire as bark thickens, making future fire-only management strategies more challenging. Compounded growth and MPB outbreak have reduced the relative longevity of the thinned units, but the thin + burn is still sufficiently different because of the combined overstory and understory treatment (similar to studies without MPB outbreak, e.g., Stephens et al 2012, Rossman et al 2018. Given that historical fire return intervals at Lubrecht Experimental Forest ranged up to 14 yr (Grissino-Mayer et al 2006), the same period over which this study reports an overall trend toward convergence, this interval may also be appropriate as a treatment regime return interval to improve long-term resilience in this forest type (Reinhardt et al 2008), though increased fire frequencies with warming climate may require shorter treatment return intervals.…”
Section: Treatment Convergence and Longevitymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…), particularly for herbaceous perennials (Rossman et al. ). Lack of long‐term (15 yr) plant responses to a single‐entry burn may be expected in forests that are characterized historically by frequent fire.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, Rossman et al. ) or homogenize plant community patterns. Others point out that these inconsistencies may reflect the fact that species‐specific responses are lost when all taxa are lumped together into very broad categories such as herbaceous plants (Willms et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation