“…The identity was confirmed by UPLC-ToF-MS and NMR experiments. The spectroscopic data were in excellent accordance with the published data . UV (H 2 O/ACN/formic acid 67/32.9/0.1, v/v/v) 280 nm; UPLC-ToF-MS (ESI + ) found m / z 329.1753, calcdd 329.1753 (Δ 0.1 mDa) for C 20 H 25 O 4 ([M + H] + ); 1 H NMR (MeOD, 500 MHz) δ 1.05 (3H, s, H20), 1.33 (1H, m, H12a), 1.50–1.68 (4H, m, H6a, H7a, H15a, H15b), 1.82 (1H, m, H7b), 1.89 (1H, m, H14a), 2.02 (1H, m, H9), 2.08–2.15 (2H, m, H12b, H14b), 2.55–2.57 (2H, m, H1a, H13), 2.66 (1H, d, J = 16.0 Hz, H1b), 2.91 (1H, dd, J = 12.2, 2.1 Hz, H5), 3.60 (1H, d, J = 11.8 Hz, H17a), 3.69 (1H, d, J = 11.8 Hz, H17b), 4.44 (1H, bs, H11), 6.60 (1H, d, J = 1.7 Hz, H18), 7.80 (1H, d, J = 1.7 Hz, H19); 13 C NMR (MeOD, 125 MHz) δ 16.1 (C20, CH3), 22.2 (C6, CH2), 36.8 (C7, CH2), 40.3 (C14, CH), 42.4 (C13, CH2), 43.3 (C10, C), 43.6 (C12, CH2), 44.7 (C8, C), 45.9 (C5, CH), 52.9 (C15, CH2), 53.9 (C1, CH2), 56.1 (C9, CH), 65.1 (C17, CH2), 77.5 (C11, CH), 90.0 (C16, C), 110.8 (C18, CH), 143.0 (C4, C), 146.0 (C3, C), 149.5 (C19, CH), 186.0 (C2, C).…”