1977
DOI: 10.1016/0302-3524(77)90021-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benthic and epibenthic macroinvertebrates of the Hudson River

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous work on the distribution and population density of benthic and epibenthic macroinvertebrates in the Hudson River has indicated that (1) salinity is the most important factor controlling species range, and (2) the number of species and organisms was highest in the more saline (5 to 30 %o) reaches of the estuary, such as the inner-harbor area of New York City, and lowest in the lower salinity (0-5 %o) and fresh water zones [Ristich et al, 1977]. In this study we have measured the vertical distribution of fallout and reactor-released radionuclides in sediment cores collected throughout the salinity range of the Hudson estuary and compared these mea-relatively minor, even though these areas may have much higher rates of sediment mixing as a a result of a greater number of organisms, gas-bubble formation, or current and human activities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work on the distribution and population density of benthic and epibenthic macroinvertebrates in the Hudson River has indicated that (1) salinity is the most important factor controlling species range, and (2) the number of species and organisms was highest in the more saline (5 to 30 %o) reaches of the estuary, such as the inner-harbor area of New York City, and lowest in the lower salinity (0-5 %o) and fresh water zones [Ristich et al, 1977]. In this study we have measured the vertical distribution of fallout and reactor-released radionuclides in sediment cores collected throughout the salinity range of the Hudson estuary and compared these mea-relatively minor, even though these areas may have much higher rates of sediment mixing as a a result of a greater number of organisms, gas-bubble formation, or current and human activities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Juvenile Atlantic Sturgeon overwinter in lower reaches of the Hudson River, before migrating to primary foraging habitat as spring temperatures warm (Bain, 1994, 1997; Bain et al, 2000). These habitats include soft‐bottom sediments in deeper waters of Haverstraw Bay, which warm during spring, occur within the salt‐freshwater interface, and hold an abundance of preferred forage (e.g., Amphipoda, Isopoda, and Polychaeta; Brosse et al, 2000; Guilbard et al, 2007; Haley et al, 1996; Moser & Ross, 1995; Ristich et al, 1977). Habitat conditions coupled with migratory behavior may bring a flux of fish into or through a target sample area in spring that leads to increased catch rates (Sweka et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Juvenile Atlantic Sturgeon prefer mesohaline water (salinity 3–15 ppt) and concentrate near or downstream of the salt front (Gilbert, 1989; Haley et al, 1996; Moser & Ross, 1995), so salt front movement affects availability to the survey. Salinity is a driving force in estuarine environments that influences the benthic foraging environment (Cloern et al, 2017; Guilbard et al, 2007; Ristich et al, 1977) and optimal metabolic rates for juvenile Atlantic Sturgeon (Allen et al, 2014; Niklitscheck & Secor, 2009). Because of these interactions, salinity alone may not fully account for sturgeon distribution and abundance, whereas a distance to salt front metric may integrate across imperfectly correlated metrics (Hatin et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation