2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10533-021-00821-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benthic and planktonic inorganic nutrient processing rates at the interface between a river and lake

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the higher prevalence of flushing in the backwater could reflect transport of phytoplankton from the main channel into the backwater. Backwater areas in Pool 8 of the UMR tend to have a lower chlorophyll‐a concentration than the main channel (Houser, 2016; Jankowski, 2022) as a result of high aquatic vegetation biomass that can outcompete phytoplankton for light and nutrients (Carhart et al., 2021; Larson et al., 2021). Thus, a flushing signal aligns with the idea that a large portion of the phytoplankton are delivered to the backwater from larger main channel sources (Manier et al., 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the higher prevalence of flushing in the backwater could reflect transport of phytoplankton from the main channel into the backwater. Backwater areas in Pool 8 of the UMR tend to have a lower chlorophyll‐a concentration than the main channel (Houser, 2016; Jankowski, 2022) as a result of high aquatic vegetation biomass that can outcompete phytoplankton for light and nutrients (Carhart et al., 2021; Larson et al., 2021). Thus, a flushing signal aligns with the idea that a large portion of the phytoplankton are delivered to the backwater from larger main channel sources (Manier et al., 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taken together, it may be that labile DP is both consumed by heterotrophic bacteria and serves as a nutrient source for primary producers at the rivermouth, whereas the more recalcitrant DOM and MP are simply transported from river to lake (i.e., the rivermouth is acting as a pipe, sensu Cole et al, 2007). Nutrient modeling of a Lake Michigan rivermouth (Fox River) suggests that it acts as a sink for SRP through microbial uptake (Larson et al, 2021), and it's possible that similar processes result loss of DP in the rivermouth. This shift in balance between production and consumption of DP and DOC is likely attributable to the distinct conditions that arise from mixing of lake water with river water (Larson et al, 2007(Larson et al, , 2021.…”
Section: Coupling Of Doc To Dop Across the River To Lake Transectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nutrient modeling of a Lake Michigan rivermouth (Fox River) suggests that it acts as a sink for SRP through microbial uptake (Larson et al, 2021), and it's possible that similar processes result loss of DP in the rivermouth. This shift in balance between production and consumption of DP and DOC is likely attributable to the distinct conditions that arise from mixing of lake water with river water (Larson et al, 2007(Larson et al, , 2021.…”
Section: Coupling Of Doc To Dop Across the River To Lake Transectmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…21 Most recently, combining with machine learning, 22 groundwater discharge from the lake floor, 23 and the contributions of wastewater treatment technologies were incorporated and quantified in the models for N and P removal. 24 The influence of river mouths, the loads of N and P from a tributary to the nearshore zone of a lake 25 and storm-based nutrient loss were also incorporated for the estimate of runoff and soil loss. 26 Lake Chaohu in Anhui Province is the fifth largest shallow freshwater lake in China.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%