2009
DOI: 10.3354/meps08079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benthic ecology of pockmarks in the Inner Oslofjord, Norway

Abstract: Despite pockmarks being one of the most widespread small-scale topographic features of the seabed, almost nothing is known of their influence on fauna. Here we present the first ecological study of fjordic pockmarks, focusing on the contrast between macrofauna inside and outside of these craters. We report an analysis of macrofauna from 27 pockmarks of the Inner Oslofjord, Norway. Five replicate grab samples were collected from each of 3 pockmarks at 3 sites plus a further control (non-pockmark) sample at each… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(47 reference statements)
3
16
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For macrofauna on the other hand, there is literature available describing communities inside and outside pockmarks. In brief, bioturbating macrofaunal species in sediment communities were found to be significantly different inside and outside of pockmarks at several locations in the Oslofjord suggesting that pockmarks influence the distribution of macrofaunal species [11]. Bioturbators can both redistribute particles and/or ventilate the sediments by moving water in or out of the burrows, which could affect both redox gradients and availability of microbial resources (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For macrofauna on the other hand, there is literature available describing communities inside and outside pockmarks. In brief, bioturbating macrofaunal species in sediment communities were found to be significantly different inside and outside of pockmarks at several locations in the Oslofjord suggesting that pockmarks influence the distribution of macrofaunal species [11]. Bioturbators can both redistribute particles and/or ventilate the sediments by moving water in or out of the burrows, which could affect both redox gradients and availability of microbial resources (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soft sediment environments have previously been considered to have low topographic structure (Pethick 1984). However, features such as pockmarks and iceberg scours are now being recognized as important in structuring soft sediment environments (Webb et al 2009). Pockmarks are craters formed in the seafloor, presumably by the expulsion of fluids from the sediments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of these genera, the bivalve mollusc Thyasira sp., was found in low abundances at St 20 and 40. This genus, is known to predominantly utilise sulphur-oxidising bacteria for obtaining nutrition, therefore, its presence may indicate the presence of gas seeps at these locations (Dando et al, 1991, Webb et al, 2009a, Wildish et al, 2008. It must be noted, however, that this genus also occurs in organic-rich sediments (Dando et al, 1991) and may also explain its presence in Dunmanus Bay.…”
Section: Pockmarks and Benthic Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Communities of polychaetes and echinoderms have previously been observed in a North Sea pockmark (Dando et al, 1991), though the species composition differs in that there are few Amphiura sp. This composition is not specific to pockmarked regions; Oslo fjord, for example, is also dominated by polychaetes and bivalve molluscs (Webb et al, 2009a), but this is more representative of the regional biota than pockmark. The polychaete and echinoderm mix of infauna in Dunmanus Bay is similar to Killary Harbour, also in the west of Ireland, (Keegan and Mercer, 1986), particularly with regard to the Amphiura brittle star community, though A. filiformis dominates A. chiajei in Dunmanus Bay.…”
Section: Pockmarks and Benthic Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 98%