2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2007.04.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benthic status of near-shore fishing grounds in the central Philippines and associated seahorse densities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 1997/1998 El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) further resulted in the massive decline of live coral cover in the Philippines (Arceo et al 2001) and subsequent decline in reef fish populations in many parts of the world (Graham et al 2008). A recent report of Marcus et al (2007) states that based on 28 coral reef fishing grounds examined in central Philippines, the magnitude of coral-reef destruction is alarming; these authors reported that only 12% of the reefs are covered with live coral and the rest is covered with abiotic structures (69%, e.g., coral rubble) and Sargassum (11%). Although only a few fish species are heavily coral dependent, most reef fishes are reliant on the reef matrix for protection at some stage in their life cycle (Graham et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 1997/1998 El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) further resulted in the massive decline of live coral cover in the Philippines (Arceo et al 2001) and subsequent decline in reef fish populations in many parts of the world (Graham et al 2008). A recent report of Marcus et al (2007) states that based on 28 coral reef fishing grounds examined in central Philippines, the magnitude of coral-reef destruction is alarming; these authors reported that only 12% of the reefs are covered with live coral and the rest is covered with abiotic structures (69%, e.g., coral rubble) and Sargassum (11%). Although only a few fish species are heavily coral dependent, most reef fishes are reliant on the reef matrix for protection at some stage in their life cycle (Graham et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…slow‐moving, limited home ranges, mate‐fidelity and low fecundity relative to other fish species), and current seahorse harvest rates warrant concern (Vincent et al ., ). In addition, seahorses are sensitive to habitat degradation caused by trawling on soft‐bottom environments, dynamiting on coral reefs and other destructive capture methods (Duarte, ; Marcus et al ., ), further impeding population recovery. The geographic range, population size and habitat preferences for many species are still unknown, creating uncertainty in conservation assessments to evaluate the effects of trade and habitat degradation on wild populations.…”
Section: New Records Of Hippocampus Mohnikei From Cambodia Malaysiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Florida, populations of H. zosterae and S. scovelli in Tampa Bay declined during demolition and construction phases of two nearby marina projects that damaged seagrass habitats (Masonjones et al , 2010). In the Philippines, coral reefs that had been degraded by blast and poison fishing had very low densities of Hippocampus comes Cantor 1849 (Marcus et al , 2007). A fourth example points to the need to assess habitat damage carefully: the eelgrass in damaged vegetation was in sufficiently good condition that Stigmatopora nigra Kaup 1856 preferred the vegetation over more open areas (Connolly, 1994).…”
Section: Effects Of Habitat Changementioning
confidence: 99%