2016
DOI: 10.18203/2349-2902.isj20164460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benzodiazepine hypnotics as oral preanaesthetic medication: a comparative clinical study

Abstract: Background:An ideal pre-medicant should allay fear and anxiety without producing its effect on vital functions of the body and body chemistry, with minimal depression of the respiratory and circulatory systems. The ideal pre-medicant with all good qualities and no side effects at all is yet to be found. The search for a drug which will be an appropriate pre-anesthetic medication is still going.Methods: Four drugs of BZD group namely diazepam, nitrazepam, lorazepam, and oxazepam were chosen as oral pre-anesthet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it has a narrow therapeutic range, so that respiratory distress is more likely to occur when there is carelessness in use. In this combination, midazolam plays a role as a sedation agent chosen because of its rapid onset and short half-life (Dasgupta et al, 2017). A study in the Netherlands showed that the mean dose of midazolam needed to sedate a child less than six years old was twice as required for an adult (Verhage, Mulder & Willekens, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it has a narrow therapeutic range, so that respiratory distress is more likely to occur when there is carelessness in use. In this combination, midazolam plays a role as a sedation agent chosen because of its rapid onset and short half-life (Dasgupta et al, 2017). A study in the Netherlands showed that the mean dose of midazolam needed to sedate a child less than six years old was twice as required for an adult (Verhage, Mulder & Willekens, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%