1964
DOI: 10.1007/bf00904689
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

�ber die Homogenit�t dotierter Zinkoxide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…a) Evolution of important SW standards provided by the W3C. [ 49 ] b) Chronology of ontology development with important milestones: The agreement on Gruber's definition, [ 18 ] a global successful applied example in the life sciences (GO [ 1 ] ), the appearance of upper‐level ontologies (SUMO, [ 61 ] DOLCE, [ 6 ] BFO, [ 7 ] PROV‐O [ 43 ] ), the creation of the QUDT, [ 47 ] a rich ontology for quantities, units, and dimensions, or the availability of ontology repositories (BioPortal, [ 62 ] OntoPortal [ 63 ] ). Advanced midlevel ontologies with worldwide scope have also been included (IOF, [ 64 ] CCO, [ 65 ] EMMO [ 45 ] ), as well as the conversion of BFO [ 7 ] not as a standard de facto but de iure as an ISO document.…”
Section: Mainmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…a) Evolution of important SW standards provided by the W3C. [ 49 ] b) Chronology of ontology development with important milestones: The agreement on Gruber's definition, [ 18 ] a global successful applied example in the life sciences (GO [ 1 ] ), the appearance of upper‐level ontologies (SUMO, [ 61 ] DOLCE, [ 6 ] BFO, [ 7 ] PROV‐O [ 43 ] ), the creation of the QUDT, [ 47 ] a rich ontology for quantities, units, and dimensions, or the availability of ontology repositories (BioPortal, [ 62 ] OntoPortal [ 63 ] ). Advanced midlevel ontologies with worldwide scope have also been included (IOF, [ 64 ] CCO, [ 65 ] EMMO [ 45 ] ), as well as the conversion of BFO [ 7 ] not as a standard de facto but de iure as an ISO document.…”
Section: Mainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gruber defines “An ontology is an explicit specification of a conceptualization”. [ 18 ] Ontology creation involves the description of knowledge through specified terms (formalized vocabularies) and their relationships to other terms, usually covering a specific domain represented by a community of users. The semantic web languages OWL (https://www.w3.org/OWL/) (Web Ontology Language) and its revised extension OWL2 (https://www.w3.org/TR/2012/REC-owl2-overview-20121211/) enable the creation and sharing of ontologies over the Web aiming at making Web content more accessible to machines.…”
Section: Mainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 9 ] An ontology of a specific domain can be defined as a set of relevant concepts (typically terms, their unique identifiers, and sometimes synonyms), relations (between concepts), and definitions (of the concepts). [ 10–12 ] An extended definition of “ontology” and other key terms mentioned throughout the article can be found in Table S2 in the Supporting Information. In the context of extracting information from text, ontologies serve to identify terms and the categories they belong too (much like a taxonomy or a vocabulary), but also to recognize hierarchies, rules, and relations between concepts, as well text understanding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%