1951
DOI: 10.1007/bf00683812
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

�ber monoculare Dominanz (?�ugigkeit?); alte und neue (haploskopische) Methoden zu ihrem Nachweis und deren Wert f�r ihre Beurteilung

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1954
1954
1970
1970

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Like Duke-Elder, he doubts whether ocular dominance plays an important part in normal binocular vision, i.e., in the final three-dimensional percept, although there is a definite preference for one eye in monocular tasks. In contradiction to this view, Kuchle and Remky (1951) consider dominance of one eye as a functional requirement rather than regarding the dominant eye as a preferred eye. According to them, the visual impression of space, the binocular perception, is determined decisivelv by the visual impressions received by the dominant eye.…”
Section: Other Criteria Of Handednessmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Like Duke-Elder, he doubts whether ocular dominance plays an important part in normal binocular vision, i.e., in the final three-dimensional percept, although there is a definite preference for one eye in monocular tasks. In contradiction to this view, Kuchle and Remky (1951) consider dominance of one eye as a functional requirement rather than regarding the dominant eye as a preferred eye. According to them, the visual impression of space, the binocular perception, is determined decisivelv by the visual impressions received by the dominant eye.…”
Section: Other Criteria Of Handednessmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…On the other hand, Hughes (1953) and La Grone and Holland (1943) found right eyedness related positively to right handedness. Kuchle and Remky (1951) using a sensory criterion for ocular dominance (persistence of monocular parts of fusion targets), found no relationship between ocular dominance and handedness.…”
Section: Ambi-ocularmentioning
confidence: 98%