2002
DOI: 10.1049/el:20021015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BER performance evaluation for MC-CDMA systems in Nakagami- m fading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is due to the inadequate assumption of a Gaussian MAI model when the number of active users is small (K < 10). In [8], we have compared the analytical results for EGC receivers using the proposed AGA technique and the method proposed in [8]. It was shown that the two analytical methods give quite the same analysis results from which the accuracy of the presented analysis method was further demonstrated.…”
Section: Numerical and Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This is due to the inadequate assumption of a Gaussian MAI model when the number of active users is small (K < 10). In [8], we have compared the analytical results for EGC receivers using the proposed AGA technique and the method proposed in [8]. It was shown that the two analytical methods give quite the same analysis results from which the accuracy of the presented analysis method was further demonstrated.…”
Section: Numerical and Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It was shown that the two analytical methods give quite the same analysis results from which the accuracy of the presented analysis method was further demonstrated. However, the method presented in [8] requires that the fading channels on all subcarriers have the same fading parameters.…”
Section: Numerical and Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It's easy to show that xn is gamma distributed RV with parameters m and On' Then the characteristic function (CF) of xn and y can be respectively given by (fix" (s)=(1-s0)mr m (16) and q}y (s)= rr:)I-sO)mr m (17) By changing the variables in (15) and using the alternative representation of the Q-function [15], [16] Q(x)= � f "/ 2 exp ( -� 2 2 t e (x? :O) (18) 7r 0 2sm e r the average BER can be derived as Similarly to [8] and [13], when using (19) to evaluate the average BER, it is still necessary to take the "semi-analytic" approach whereby a sample average of (19) is taken where each evaluation is performed by generating a random selection of the fading amplitudes {fJ k,n } of all the K -1 interfering users and then numerically evaluates the integral in (19).…”
Section: Ber;mentioning
confidence: 99%