2022
DOI: 10.1177/10731911221081139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bereavement in the Aftermath of Suicide, Overdose, and Sudden-Natural Death: Evaluating a New Measure of Needs

Abstract: Bereavement has been associated with a number of adverse outcomes, including mortality, particularly among those who experience the sudden loss of a close other. With rising rates of sudden death in the United States, fueled by an alarming increase in fatal overdose deaths, identifying bereavement-related needs among the sudden-death bereaved is essential. The present study investigated the factor structure, internal reliability, and validity of the Sudden Bereavement Needs Inventory (SBNI) in a sample of sudd… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Next, respondents were asked to rate, using a 1–5 Likert‐type response, how important the selected need was at the time of assessment (1 = not at all important; 5 = extremely important). Based on a recent study (Bottomley & Smigelsky, 2021), the SBNI consisted of six factors reflecting distinct bereavement‐related need categories: Meaning Making Needs (e.g., to understand who I am after the loss; to make sense of the loss) , Informational Needs (e.g., to better understand the grief journey following this type of loss), Emotional Needs (e.g., to express my thoughts and feelings about the loss with those I love ), Pragmatic Needs (e.g., to eat well; to sleep well; to successfully complete daily tasks) , Spiritual Needs (e.g., to have an ongoing connection with God; to have an ongoing connection with my spiritual self ), and Relational Needs (e.g., to be with those who experienced a similar loss ). Total scores within each factor are summed to create a composite for that need category.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Next, respondents were asked to rate, using a 1–5 Likert‐type response, how important the selected need was at the time of assessment (1 = not at all important; 5 = extremely important). Based on a recent study (Bottomley & Smigelsky, 2021), the SBNI consisted of six factors reflecting distinct bereavement‐related need categories: Meaning Making Needs (e.g., to understand who I am after the loss; to make sense of the loss) , Informational Needs (e.g., to better understand the grief journey following this type of loss), Emotional Needs (e.g., to express my thoughts and feelings about the loss with those I love ), Pragmatic Needs (e.g., to eat well; to sleep well; to successfully complete daily tasks) , Spiritual Needs (e.g., to have an ongoing connection with God; to have an ongoing connection with my spiritual self ), and Relational Needs (e.g., to be with those who experienced a similar loss ). Total scores within each factor are summed to create a composite for that need category.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total scores within each factor are summed to create a composite for that need category. Psychometric properties of the SBNI were determined to be strong, including adequate convergent and discriminant validity with acceptable internal reliability within each need factor ( α = 0.70–0.91; Bottomley & Smigelsky, 2021). In the current study, inter‐item reliability was also determined to be acceptable, with alpha values ranging from 0.68 to 0.90.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation