2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.01.157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bereavement or breakup: Differences in networks of depression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The network structures were estimated as sparse Gaussian graphical models (GGM) with qgraph (Epskamp et al, 2012). We chose Spearman rank correlation as our correlation method as the impulse dyscontrol symptom data were skewed (see e.g., Burger et al, 2020; and Eiko I Fried, 2018 for discussion regarding the use of Spearman over polychoric correlations).…”
Section: Network Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The network structures were estimated as sparse Gaussian graphical models (GGM) with qgraph (Epskamp et al, 2012). We chose Spearman rank correlation as our correlation method as the impulse dyscontrol symptom data were skewed (see e.g., Burger et al, 2020; and Eiko I Fried, 2018 for discussion regarding the use of Spearman over polychoric correlations).…”
Section: Network Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The loss of a primary attachment person through separation and the associated confrontation with individual, social and economic obstacles can be challenging and renders individuals more vulnerable (Wang & Amato, 2000; Zhang et al, 2016). In a recently published network analysis study with a sample of people aged 40 or older, loneliness displayed the strongest connection to separation among depressive symptoms (Burger et al, 2020), emphasizing the social consequences of this loss. A new love was found to be beneficial to fill this gap and seems to contribute substantially to improved well-being in younger people (Soons et al, 2009).…”
Section: New Intimate Partnership After Separationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The network structures were estimated as sparse Gaussian graphical models (GGM) with qgraph (Epskamp, Cramer, Waldorp, Schmittmann, & Borsboom, 2012). We chose Spearman rank correlation as our correlation method as the impulse dyscontrol symptom data were skewed (see e.g., Burger et al, 2020;Epskamp, Borsboom, & Fried, 2018b for discussion regarding the use of Spearman over polychoric correlations). The networks were regularized with the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO; Tibshirani, 1996) that shrinks all edge weights towards zero, while also setting small edge weights to exactly zero.…”
Section: Network Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%