1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3975(96)00260-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bertrand numeration systems and recognizability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
80
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
80
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The integer val(w) is said to be the numerical value of w. So each non-negative integer n is represented by a unique word val −1 (n) ∈ L and this leads to the notion of numeration system on a regular language. These systems have been introduced in [22] and generalize classical numeration systems like the k-adic systems, the Fibonacci system and the linear numeration systems whose characteristic polynomial is the minimal polynomial of a Pisot number (for the properties of these latter systems we refer to [6]). …”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The integer val(w) is said to be the numerical value of w. So each non-negative integer n is represented by a unique word val −1 (n) ∈ L and this leads to the notion of numeration system on a regular language. These systems have been introduced in [22] and generalize classical numeration systems like the k-adic systems, the Fibonacci system and the linear numeration systems whose characteristic polynomial is the minimal polynomial of a Pisot number (for the properties of these latter systems we refer to [6]). …”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If w is the nth word of the genealogically ordered language L for some n ∈ N (positions inside L are counted from 0), then we write val(w) = n and we say that w is the representation of n or that n is the numerical value of w (the abstract numeration system S being understood). This way of representing nonnegative integers has been first introduced in [7] and generalizes classical numeration systems like the positional systems built over linear recurrent sequences of integers whose characteristic polynomial is the minimal polynomial of a Pisot number [2].…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the famous theorem of Cobham [7] states that the only sets of natural numbers that are both p-and qrecognizable, when p and q are two multiplicatively independent integers > 1, are unions of arithmetic progressions, and thus are k-recognizable for any integer k > 1. Several generalizations of Cobham's Theorem have been given, see for instance [25,10,6,17,8]. In particular this result has been extended by Bès [4] to non-standard numeration systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This implies that a set of integers which is U -recognizable is then also Y -recognizable. Note that in [6] it is proved that if U and V are two linear numeration systems with the same characteristic polynomial which is the minimal polynomial of a Pisot number, then a U -recognizable set is also V -recognizable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%