2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3115(02)01350-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beryllium and carbon films in JET following D–T operation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
29
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The major difference between the cassettes from the outer wall and the divertor was that in the latter case only very small quantities or no beryllium (especially inner divertor) have been detected. The result is in full agreement with measurements of deposition in previous campaigns in JET with a series of divertors: Mk-IIA [7,8] Mk-IIGB (Gas Box) [19] and Mk-IISRP (Septum Replacement Plate) [20]. It also agrees with the analysis of other erosion-deposition diagnostic tools used in TRS and exposed along with the mirrors in the presence of the Mk-IIHD (High Delta) divertor [21] and with general results of material migration studies in JET [22].…”
Section: Images Insupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The major difference between the cassettes from the outer wall and the divertor was that in the latter case only very small quantities or no beryllium (especially inner divertor) have been detected. The result is in full agreement with measurements of deposition in previous campaigns in JET with a series of divertors: Mk-IIA [7,8] Mk-IIGB (Gas Box) [19] and Mk-IISRP (Septum Replacement Plate) [20]. It also agrees with the analysis of other erosion-deposition diagnostic tools used in TRS and exposed along with the mirrors in the presence of the Mk-IIHD (High Delta) divertor [21] and with general results of material migration studies in JET [22].…”
Section: Images Insupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The decision on testing two materials was taken in 2002 and the motivation regarding the material choice can be found in [2]: (a) both materials were on the list of candidates for first mirrors in ITER; (b) Mo is hard, easy-to-polish metal of high thermal conductivity and low sputter erosion; (c) steel, foreseen for actively cooled mirrors, is the same material as the support structure thus the mirror distortion would be minimized. In addition, relatively low price of both materials and easy machining were important because, based on very broad erosion-deposition studies in JET [7,8] it could be expected that the reflectivity degradation would be caused mainly by co-deposition. Once carbon film starts to grow, the underlying substrate plays secondary role, as it was proven by earlier studies of co-deposition on different metallic surfaces [9].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total reflectivity was measured in the range 350-1700 nm using a photo-spectrometer (GetSpec) system complying with work procedures on materials retrieved from JET [1,2], i.e. contaminated with beryllium and tritium [9][10][11]. The integrating sphere was located in the glove-box and connected by fiber optics with externally located photo-spectrometers.…”
Section: Experimental Details: Exposure and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nuclear reaction analysis (NRA) with a 2. 11 B. Carbon and beryllium were also determined by enhanced proton scattering (EPS) with a 2.5 MeV H + beam, which allowed simultaneous studies of heavier elements using proton-induced x-ray emission (PIXE).…”
Section: Experimental Details: Exposure and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This issue becomes even more important if carbon plasma-facing components (PFCs) are used [2][3][4]. Two basic schemes for fuel removal are currently considered: (i) desorption of hydrogen-containing species and (ii) removal of the entire fuel-rich co-deposit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%