1970
DOI: 10.1007/bf01583916
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Besitzt die Proinsulinverunreinigung kommerzieller Insulinpräparate Bedeutung für die Stimulierung von Insulinantikörpern?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1973
1973
1979
1979

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Commercial preparations of mixtures of bovineporcine insulin have small and variable amounts of contaminating bovine and porcine proinsulin (17)(18)(19)(20). The se(quences of the C-segments of the precursor molecules differ from each other and from their human counterpart to a much larger extent than the insulin A and B chains (18,21,22) and have been shown to be potent antigens in both experimental animals (23)(24)(25)(26) and humans (27)(28)(29)(30). A survey of insulin-treated diabetic patients demonstrated specific proinsulin antibodies in 80% of the cases (29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commercial preparations of mixtures of bovineporcine insulin have small and variable amounts of contaminating bovine and porcine proinsulin (17)(18)(19)(20). The se(quences of the C-segments of the precursor molecules differ from each other and from their human counterpart to a much larger extent than the insulin A and B chains (18,21,22) and have been shown to be potent antigens in both experimental animals (23)(24)(25)(26) and humans (27)(28)(29)(30). A survey of insulin-treated diabetic patients demonstrated specific proinsulin antibodies in 80% of the cases (29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…administration of proinsulin, present in therapeutic insulin will induce proinsulin-specific antibodies in diabetie patients. Although a small concentration of such antibodies have been demonstrated in a pooled human sera (Kerp, Steinhilber and Kasemir 1970), their ineidence in the individual patients remains uninvestigated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%