2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)02551-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Best approach for prostate cancer detection: a prospective study on transperineal versus transrectal six-core prostate biopsy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
62
1
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
62
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing the efficacy of transperineal versus transrectal biopsy, the core number seems to be important to increase the cancer detection rate. Emiliozzi et al reported that transperineal 6-core biopsy was superior to transrectal 6-core biopsy to detect cancer [28] , whereas a recent report showed no statistical difference in cancer detection rate or in the characteristics of detected cancers between transrectal 12-core and transperineal 14-core biopsy [29] . Furthermore, to improve cancer detection, extensive 12-core biopsy using a combined transperineal and transrectal approach has been proposed, especially in patients with PSA level in the gray zone [3] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Comparing the efficacy of transperineal versus transrectal biopsy, the core number seems to be important to increase the cancer detection rate. Emiliozzi et al reported that transperineal 6-core biopsy was superior to transrectal 6-core biopsy to detect cancer [28] , whereas a recent report showed no statistical difference in cancer detection rate or in the characteristics of detected cancers between transrectal 12-core and transperineal 14-core biopsy [29] . Furthermore, to improve cancer detection, extensive 12-core biopsy using a combined transperineal and transrectal approach has been proposed, especially in patients with PSA level in the gray zone [3] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…On the other hand, the TP method missed two cancers located at the prostatic base. Emiliozzi et al 13 performed prostate biopsy with six TP cores plus six TR cores in a prospective study. Of the 43 who were diagnosed cancer, 41 (95%) were detected by the TP approach and 34 (79%) by the TR approach (P ¼ 0.012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a direct comparison between the two approaches, Kawakami and associates 20 found no significance differences in the ability to detect and characterize PCa in contrast with Emiliozzi and coworkers, 21 who reported on superiority of the TP approach. The conflicting conclusions reached by these investigators may be, at least in part, because of the different number of cores taken; while Emiliozzi and colleagues 21 reported on six cores by each approach, Kawakami and coworkers 20 obtained 12 and 14 cores by TR and TP approaches, respectively. These findings may suggest that the superiority of TP over the TR approach in detecting PCa may vanish when the number of cores is increased.…”
Section: Transrectal (Tr) or Tp?mentioning
confidence: 95%