2013
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1311.1561
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Best approximation on semi-algebraic sets and k-border rank approximation of symmetric tensors

Abstract: In the first part of this paper we study a best approximation of a vector in Euclidean space R n with respect to a closed semi-algebraic set C and a given semi-algebraic norm. Assuming that the given norm and its dual norm are differentiable we show that a best approximation is unique outside a hypersurface. We then study the case where C is an irreducible variety and the approximation is with respect to the Euclidean norm. We show that for a general point in x ∈ R n the number of critical points of the distan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clearly, π is a polynomial map. It is a dominating map [7,11]. This is a simple consequence of Lemma 4.3.…”
Section: The Case Of An Irreducible Varietymentioning
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Clearly, π is a polynomial map. It is a dominating map [7,11]. This is a simple consequence of Lemma 4.3.…”
Section: The Case Of An Irreducible Varietymentioning
confidence: 67%
“…) is an irreducible variety of dimension n [7,11]. (A short justification that Σ g (C C ) is irreducible is given in the proof of Lemma 5.1.)…”
Section: The Case Of An Irreducible Varietymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also if F has at least d elements then each S ∈ S d F n is a sum of rank-one symmetric tensors [13, Proposition 7.2]. (It is shown in [13,Proposition 7.1] that for a fixed finite field F and n 2 there exist symmetric tensors which are not sum of rank-one symmetric tensors for sufficiently large d.) In the following passage, we assume that |F| d. We define srank S, the symmetric rank of S ∈ S d F n \ {0}, as the minimal number in the decomposition of S as a sum of rank-one symmetric tensors. For matrices over a field of characteristic = 2 the symmetric rank of S ∈ S 2 F n is equal to the (standard) rank of S, whereas for d 3 there are examples of 3-symmetric tensors whose symmetric rank is greater than their tensor rank [26].…”
Section: Preliminary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A rank-one symmetric tensor in S d G n is of the form [22]. Since every algebraically closed field has an infinite number of elements it follows that every symmetric tensor has a Waring decomposition [13]. The minimal number of rank-one symmetric tensors in the decomposition of S is called a symmetric rank and is denoted as srank S. Clearly, rank S srank S. It is shown in [10,29] that in certain cases one has equality rank S = srank S. However, even for d = 3 one can have an inequality rank S < srank S [26].…”
Section: M(rn)mentioning
confidence: 99%