2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.disc.2011.04.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Best monotone degree conditions for binding number

Abstract: a b s t r a c tWe give sufficient conditions on the vertex degrees of a graph G to guarantee that G has binding number at least b, for any given b > 0. Our conditions are best possible in exactly the same way that Chvátal's well-known degree condition to guarantee a graph is Hamiltonian is best possible.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3) As noted in Section 3.2, the bound bind(G) ≥ 3/2 in Theorem 3.2.2 is best possible, and thus there is no structural implication of the form b-binding ⇒ hamiltonian, for any b < 3/2. But this implication does hold in a best monotone sense for b > 1 [10]. then π ∈ BM(1-binding) by Theorem 3.2.5, but π ∈ BM(hamiltonian), since π fails to satisfy Theorem 1.1 for i = 1 2 n − 1.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…3) As noted in Section 3.2, the bound bind(G) ≥ 3/2 in Theorem 3.2.2 is best possible, and thus there is no structural implication of the form b-binding ⇒ hamiltonian, for any b < 3/2. But this implication does hold in a best monotone sense for b > 1 [10]. then π ∈ BM(1-binding) by Theorem 3.2.5, but π ∈ BM(hamiltonian), since π fails to satisfy Theorem 1.1 for i = 1 2 n − 1.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In [10], a best monotone condition was given for a graph to be b-binding, first for 0 < b ≤ 1 and then for b ≥ 1.…”
Section: Binding Numbermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…One issue concerning binding numbers involves characterizing its boundary by using other structural parameters of the graph, such as, degree sequence [3], minimum degree [4] and connectivity [30]. Similar to vertex-connectivity and edge-connectivity, toughness and binding number are measures of the vulnerability of a graph.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%