2006
DOI: 10.1306/02070605112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Best practice stochastic facies modeling from a channel-fill turbidite sandstone analog (the Quarry outcrop, Eocene Ainsa basin, northeast Spain)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
69
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Janson & Madriz (2012) also note that most studies have been conducted on clastic systems (e.g. Deutsch & Wang 1996;Falivene et al 2006), but that the database of studies is much more limited for carbonates. In this volume, the authors provide a comparison of a surface (thickness)-based approach with an MPS approach to describe and model a lower Carboniferous mixed carbonate/ clastic sequence.…”
Section: Applications Of Geomodellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Janson & Madriz (2012) also note that most studies have been conducted on clastic systems (e.g. Deutsch & Wang 1996;Falivene et al 2006), but that the database of studies is much more limited for carbonates. In this volume, the authors provide a comparison of a surface (thickness)-based approach with an MPS approach to describe and model a lower Carboniferous mixed carbonate/ clastic sequence.…”
Section: Applications Of Geomodellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, realistic models reproducing the spatial variability of facies are necessary to provide control over the uncertainty in facies correlations, and stochastic simulation is applied with either objectbased or geostatistical methods (i.e. Haldorsen and Damsleth 1990;Deutsch and Hewett 1996;Koltermann and Gorelick 1996;Webb and Davis 1998;de Marsily et al 1998;Kupfersberger and Deutsch 1999;de Marsily et al 2005;Falivene et al 2006a and2006b). In siliciclastic aquifers, the use of realistic facies models to guide the modeling of porosity and permeability improves predictions, because these parameters are commonly correlated with facies (Anderson 1989;Jussel et al 1994;Ritzi et al 1995;Fogg et al 1998;Gómez-Hernández and Deutsch 1999).…”
Section: Sedimentary Analoguesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geological modeling methods are divided into deterministic modeling and stochastic modeling (Wu and Li, 2007). With the continuous improvement in the accuracy of reservoir prediction, stochastic modeling or combinations of deterministic and stochastic modeling methods have become more common (Falivene et al, 2006). Traditional stochastic modeling is mainly divided into variogram-based and objectbased methods (Dubrule, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%