2011
DOI: 10.1080/15578771.2011.552936
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Best Practices for Dealing with Price Volatility in Commercial Construction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although many factors can impact the construction cost, 35 one of the main contributors to cost fluctuation is the prices changes in construction resources such as materials, labor, and equipment. 4,[36][37][38] Research methods…”
Section: Research Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many factors can impact the construction cost, 35 one of the main contributors to cost fluctuation is the prices changes in construction resources such as materials, labor, and equipment. 4,[36][37][38] Research methods…”
Section: Research Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some scholars are pointing to the fact that early cost estimates can be very inaccurate (Assaf and Al-Hejji, 2006). Furthermore, construction projects are capable of fluctuating as much as 10% or more of their cost value over periods as short as 6 months (Weidman et al, 2011), which makes "project costs" an even lessreliable parameter for time estimation. Some scholars are claiming that construction activities and their embedded production rates should be emphasized more in time planning and time estimation (Lucko et al, 2014), especially for linear infrastructure projects (i.e., roads, tunnels, and highways).…”
Section: Difficulties In Early Time Estimation Of Construction Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, Delphi studies use different sizes of panels [63]. Weidman and colleagues (2011) did not specify the number of panelists needed for a Delphi study; however, it is recognized that a minimum appropriate size should include 7 or 8 panelists [79]. Mitchell and McGoldrick (1994) argued that the size should be no less than 8 to 10 members [38].…”
Section: Panelist Selection Invitation and Participationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, many studies [63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77] have showed that Delphi can be useful to (a) obtain accurate information that is unavailable, (b) handle complex Sustainability 2019, 11, 3166 3 of 32 problems that require more judgmental analysis, (c) define areas where there is considerable uncertainty and/or a lack of agreed knowledge or disagreement, (d) allow for combining fragmentary perspectives into a collective understanding, (e) model a real world phenomena involving a range of viewpoints and for which there is little established quantitative evidence, and (f) highlight topics of concern and assess uncertainty in a quantitative manner. In particular, based on the summary explained in Appendix A [78][79][80][81][82][83][84], this research accordingly chose the Delphi technique to develop sustainable city indicators (SCIs) for Cambodia through three-round panel surveys. Delphi Round 1 initially developed the indicators.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%