Best practices for genotype imputation from low‐coverage sequencing data in natural populations

Abstract

Monitoring genetic diversity in wild populations is a central goal of ecological and evolutionary genetics and is critical for conservation biology. However, genetic studies of nonmodel organisms generally lack access to species‐specific genotyping methods (e.g. array‐based genotyping) and must instead use sequencing‐based approaches. Although costs are decreasing, high‐coverage whole‐genome sequencing (WGS), which produces the highest confidence genotypes, remains expensive. More economical reduced representation sequencing approaches fail to capture much of the genome, which can hinder downstream inference. Low‐coverage WGS combined with imputation using a high‐confidence reference panel is a cost‐effective alternative, but the accuracy of genotyping using low‐coverage WGS and imputation in nonmodel populations is still largely uncharacterized. Here, we empirically tested the accuracy of low‐coverage sequencing (0.1–10×) and imputation in two natural populations, one with a large (n = 741) reference panel, rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta), and one with a smaller (n = 68) reference panel, gelada monkeys (Theropithecus gelada). Using samples sequenced to coverage as low as 0.5×, we could impute genotypes at >95% of the sites in the reference panel with high accuracy (median r2 ≥ 0.92). We show that low‐coverage imputed genotypes can reliably calculate genetic relatedness and population structure. Based on these data, we also provide best practices and recommendations for researchers who wish to deploy this approach in other populations, with all code available on GitHub (https://github.com/mwatowich/LoCSI‐for‐non‐model‐species). Our results endorse accurate and effective genotype imputation from low‐coverage sequencing, enabling the cost‐effective generation of population‐scale genetic datasets necessary for tackling many pressing challenges of wildlife conservation.

Unraveling the Genomic Diversity and Admixture History of Captive Tigers in the United States

“…An imputation pipeline can be particularly useful in wildlife forensics where the ancestry or identity of the individual is unknown, but also for cost-effective sequencing of many individuals. Imputation is generally used in the context of low-coverage data to increase the reliability of genotype calls and improve the accuracy of downstream analyses, and has recently been advocated as an alternative to reduced representation approaches in non-model species, which often amplify a small and potentially biased portion of the genome (40). The primary goal of the reference panel was to assess whether we could accurately impute ultra-low coverage data for the purpose of individual identification and ancestry determination in tigers.…”