2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.micron.2018.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Best practices for preparing radioactive specimens for EBSD analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the data quality is extremely sensitive to the integrity of the crystallographic lattice order at the surface of the sample and to oxidation [2]. While conventional sample preparation methods are widely used in materials science, they often do not lead to quality electron backscattered patterns needed for characterization of the nuclear materials [3]. Due to challenges associated with handling radiological specimens, rapid oxidation of the specimens, and "artifacts" (high number of defects, precipitates and/or porosities) [3][4][5][6][7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the data quality is extremely sensitive to the integrity of the crystallographic lattice order at the surface of the sample and to oxidation [2]. While conventional sample preparation methods are widely used in materials science, they often do not lead to quality electron backscattered patterns needed for characterization of the nuclear materials [3]. Due to challenges associated with handling radiological specimens, rapid oxidation of the specimens, and "artifacts" (high number of defects, precipitates and/or porosities) [3][4][5][6][7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While conventional sample preparation methods are widely used in materials science, they often do not lead to quality electron backscattered patterns needed for characterization of the nuclear materials [3]. Due to challenges associated with handling radiological specimens, rapid oxidation of the specimens, and "artifacts" (high number of defects, precipitates and/or porosities) [3][4][5][6][7]. Thus, the Focused Ion Beam (FIB) glazing technique [1,4,6] has been used and optimized for EBSD collection for this fuel type.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 While conventional sample preparation methods are widely used in materials science, they often do not lead to quality electron backscatter patterns needed for the characterization of nuclear materials. 4 This has been related by many authors to the challenges associated with handling radiological specimens, their rapid oxidation, and artifacts in such samples (e.g., high number of defects, precipitates and/or porosities). 4,5,6,7,8 EBSD, however, can be an invaluable technique to evaluate microstructural evolution during fabrication and after irradiation at the required mesoscale for model and simulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 This has been related by many authors to the challenges associated with handling radiological specimens, their rapid oxidation, and artifacts in such samples (e.g., high number of defects, precipitates and/or porosities). 4,5,6,7,8 EBSD, however, can be an invaluable technique to evaluate microstructural evolution during fabrication and after irradiation at the required mesoscale for model and simulation. It also provides important information on grain structure necessary to understand irradiation effect, such as grain subdivision.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%