2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Best practices for reporting individual identification using camera trap photographs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It was a photo or an event that was independent. The criteria for independence of animal photographs were: (i) continuous shots of the same or different individual animals; (ii) continuous photos of the same animal of the same species which were taken 30 minutes apart, and (iii) discontinuous photos of the same animal of the same species (Choo et al 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was a photo or an event that was independent. The criteria for independence of animal photographs were: (i) continuous shots of the same or different individual animals; (ii) continuous photos of the same animal of the same species which were taken 30 minutes apart, and (iii) discontinuous photos of the same animal of the same species (Choo et al 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At least three well-trained observers in each site were involved in the intensive identification process of identifying lynx individuals by using an online multipurpose photographic database and cross-check verification. Identification of individuals and data processing followed minimum camera-trapping standards reported by Choo et al 47 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At least three well-trained observers in each site were www.nature.com/scientificreports/ involved in the intensive identification process of identifying lynx individuals by using an online multipurpose photographic database and cross-check verification. Identification of individuals and data processing followed minimum camera-trapping standards reported by Choo et al 47 . Sex and age category of individuals was determined from clearly visible genital parts and captures of leading females with kittens in the pictures, as well as from videos gained through previous deterministic and opportunistic camera-trapping 32,[44][45][46] or through genetic analyses 29 .…”
Section: Identification Of Individuals and Determination Of Social Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies frequently adopt a top-down perspective in which the predominant focus is on groups (e.g., populations), with individuals simply viewed as units within the group and minimal interpretation of individual variability. As such, many of the modeling techniques employed for applied investigations, such as mark–recapture ( Royle et al 2013 ; Choo et al 2020 ), are adept at incorporating quantified uncertainty in identification. However, reliable identification of individuals in applied studies is essential to accurate enumeration and differentiation when creating generalized models based on individual observations ( Marin-Cudraz et al 2019 ).…”
Section: Applications Of Animal Identification In Field and Laboratory Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in some scenarios, the acceptable level of analytical error can be reduced without compromising the investigation of specific project goals, in which case biologists may find that current computer vision techniques are sufficiently robust to address applied biological questions in a manner that is low cost, logistically efficient, and can make use of pre-existing and archival images and video footage. In particular, the mark–recapture model, commonly employed in biological and ecological studies, lends itself well to a photo-identification adjustment ( Royle et al 2013 ; Choo et al 2020 ). In a reworked format, the first photo would be a “capture,” the photo-identification would be the “mark,” and subsequent images would be the “recapture.” Other types of data or partial data, for example, time stamp or GPS location, may be incorporated to boost the success rate of photo-identification in mark–recapture models ( Augustine et al 2019 , 2020 ).…”
Section: Applications Of Animal Identification In Field and Laboratory Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%