2014
DOI: 10.1111/petr.12260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Best practices in the pediatric pretransplant psychosocial evaluation

Abstract: Assessment of psychosocial functioning is an often-included component of the pretransplant evaluation process. This study reviews several domains of assessment that have been related to post-transplant outcomes across solid organ transplant populations. These include evaluation of patient and family past adherence, knowledge about the transplantation process, and their neurocognitive, psychological, and family functioning. To date, few comprehensive pretransplant evaluation measures have been standardized for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, great inconsistency in the findings of studies and the current knowledge around predictors of non‐adherence greatly undermines efforts to develop an evidence‐based, standardized psychosocial assessment within pediatric organ transplantation. Development and refinement of standardized and evidenced psychosocial assessments may be an invaluable tool for transplant teams concerned about patient psychosocial problems . A quality assessment tool should be able to predict future adherence issues, and resulting ratings should correlate with health‐related quality‐of‐life, psychosocial, health, and transplant‐specific medical outcomes .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, great inconsistency in the findings of studies and the current knowledge around predictors of non‐adherence greatly undermines efforts to develop an evidence‐based, standardized psychosocial assessment within pediatric organ transplantation. Development and refinement of standardized and evidenced psychosocial assessments may be an invaluable tool for transplant teams concerned about patient psychosocial problems . A quality assessment tool should be able to predict future adherence issues, and resulting ratings should correlate with health‐related quality‐of‐life, psychosocial, health, and transplant‐specific medical outcomes .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the pediatric transplant psychosocial team advocates for patients from early childhood through young adulthood and works with patients around important psychosocial challenges affecting their care. Continued assessment of psychosocial factors aims to identify barriers to successful outcomes over time and identify areas for intervention to reduce these barriers …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of a pretransplant psychosocial assessment is difficult given the need to include aspects of the child, family, aspects of the medical care, and illness‐related factors in a multifaceted assessment. A recent review of best practice in pediatric transplant psychosocial assessment stressed the need for standardized assessment focusing on a number of domains surrounding the child and family . Best practices highlighted include not only assessment of the child and the parents but also that of the family as a system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The items on the assessment cover knowledge about the transplant, motivation for transplantation, previous adherence problems, patient psychiatric problems, parental psychiatric concerns, substance abuse history, questions concerning the family environment, external support for the family, and the relationship with the medical team. Despite the support for these domains and their association with post‐transplant adherence, the instrument has found to have low inter‐rater reliability . Other psychometric properties of the instrument have not been tested including the ability of the scores to predict adherence and outcomes during the later post‐transplant period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation