1974
DOI: 10.1007/bf01668640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bestimmung des Kernstrukturparameters der inneren Konversion und derE2-Beimischung fürM 1-Übergänge in201Tl und203Tl

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

1974
1974
1984
1984

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the g-factors obtained we have calculated the penetration parameter of the 5/2 + --*3/2 + transition in 2~ (which was not included in the fit, as explained above). The value derived (2=0.46 +0.02) is consistent with that measured (2=0.5_+0.5 [5]). Unfortunately the large experimental error makes the comparison not very significant.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…With the g-factors obtained we have calculated the penetration parameter of the 5/2 + --*3/2 + transition in 2~ (which was not included in the fit, as explained above). The value derived (2=0.46 +0.02) is consistent with that measured (2=0.5_+0.5 [5]). Unfortunately the large experimental error makes the comparison not very significant.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Following Glaudemans et al [18] the errors in the ground state magnetic moments, reported in Table 2 and used in the )r minimization procedure (see below), have been fixed at the 5 ~o level whereas the values given in literature amount to 1 ~o in 2~ [-4] and 0.05 ~o in z~176 [6,3] respectively. The correlation between the errors in the quantities 2 and M r has been neglected in the estimate of the total error in M e. It has not been possible to utilize the penetration parameter of the 5/2 + ~3/2 + transition [5] in 2~ to deduce the penetration matrix element as the corresponding M r has not yet been measured. The smallness of the coefficients of g~(7/2) and g~(7/2, 5/2) in all the equations of the system makes it impossible to extract any information about these unknowns.…”
Section: Calculation Of Effective Gyromagnetic Ratiosmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sizeable penetration effects have been detected in Z~ (2=4.0 [6]) and in 2~ (2=6.4 [7]). On the basis of the R,~ values also larger effects could be expected in 2~…”
Section: _ (@ Iimi~ E~ [[J~)mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…method [8]. The required normalization has been made with respect to the eK of the 279.2 keV transition in 2~ [4] whose experimental value is very accurately known [6,9]. The 3/2 + levels in 2~ and 2~…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%