2022
DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2098376
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beta-blocker treatment in the critically ill: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: Background Critical illness may lead to activation of the sympathetic system. The sympathetic stimulation may be further increased by exogenous catecholamines, such as vasopressors and inotropes. Excessive adrenergic stress has been associated with organ dysfunction and higher mortality. β -Blockers may reduce the adrenergic burden, but they may also compromise perfusion to vital organs thus worsening organ dysfunction. To assess the effect of treatment with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“… Wang et al, 2023 ). This result aligns with a prior meta-analysis, indicating no significant variance in vasopressor requirement at both 48 and 72 hours ( Heliste et al, 2022 ). The higher doses of vasopressor required by the esmolol-treated group can be attributed to the hypotensive effect of esmolol, however, the decline in vasopressor requirements along both studies' time points may be related to the disease remission and the improvement in the patient’s clinical status.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… Wang et al, 2023 ). This result aligns with a prior meta-analysis, indicating no significant variance in vasopressor requirement at both 48 and 72 hours ( Heliste et al, 2022 ). The higher doses of vasopressor required by the esmolol-treated group can be attributed to the hypotensive effect of esmolol, however, the decline in vasopressor requirements along both studies' time points may be related to the disease remission and the improvement in the patient’s clinical status.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Indeed, this finding is consistent with a previous meta-analysis that included 11 randomized clinical trials and comprised 2103 critically ill patients, showing a lower mortality risk for more than 14 days in the beta-blockers group compared to the control group. However, there was no significant difference in the mortality risk in less than 14 days’ term ( Heliste et al, 2022 ). Another multicenter propensity score study included 1556 patients on beta-blocker therapy before ICU admission matched to 1556 patients with non-previous use of beta-blockers and found a lower 30-day mortality risk in patients who were on beta-blockers ( Christensen et al, 2011 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Moreover, beta blockers can ameliorate renal function by reducing sympathetic activation and renal oxygen consumption [ 41 , 43 ]. Therefore, although beta blockers reduced mortality in critical ill patients [ 44 ], we recommend future randomized controlled trials on octogenarians to determine the optimal target group of patients, choice of beta blocker, timing of treatment, and the optimal hemodynamic targets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is evidenced by the fact that β-blockers are widely used and have been included in both European and American guidelines for supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias. There are also other benefits from the use of this group of drugs–it was noted that in hospitalized patients in severe clinical condition, treatment with beta-blockers reduced long-term mortality ( Heliste et al, 2022 ). Also in patients with sepsis, prior exposure to beta-blockers has been associated with reduced mortality ( Tan et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Studies Justifying the Use Of β-Blockers In Cardiac Arrhythmiasmentioning
confidence: 99%