1993
DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(93)91564-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beta-decay to the proton halo state in 17F

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
35
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
5
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We will devote a special discussion to A = 17 nuclei, since they have already got a lot of attention from both experimental and theoretical sides, because of the enormously large asymmetries of the first forbidden β-decay transition rates [56,57,58].…”
Section: A=17mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will devote a special discussion to A = 17 nuclei, since they have already got a lot of attention from both experimental and theoretical sides, because of the enormously large asymmetries of the first forbidden β-decay transition rates [56,57,58].…”
Section: A=17mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proton-rich 17 Ne is a candidate for a two-proton halo [2,3], cluster structures have been found in 20−22 Ne and 24 Mg [4], and the isotopes around N = 20 make up the so-called island of inversion [5], where a weakening or even disappearance of the neutron magic number is visible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In paper [12] effects of the "halo" kind (connected with larger radial extension of WF on the proton side) were considered being irrelevant for the β-decay asymmetry problem [9]. However, in paper [14] the β-decay asymmetry was successfully explained in these terms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Available experimental data include Coulomb excitation [4,5] and low energy nuclear fragmentation [6,7] configuration is predicted to dominate, while in paper [11] the dominating configuration is predicted to be d 2 . In paper [12] effects of the "halo" kind (connected with larger radial extension of WF on the proton side) were considered being irrelevant for the β-decay asymmetry problem [9]. However, in paper [14] the β-decay asymmetry was successfully explained in these terms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%