2006
DOI: 10.1007/bf03022501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Betamethasone does not prevent nausea and vomiting induced by the dopamine-agonist apomorphine

Abstract: Purpose:The mechanism of the antiemetic actions of corticosteroids is not known. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if betamethasone can prevent nausea, vomiting or increase of vasopressin induced by apomorphine. Metoclopramide, a dopamine antagonist, was used as a control substance. Methods:Ten healthy volunteers were studied on three occasions. In a randomized order they were allocated to receive pretreatment with betamethasone 8 mg iv, metoclopramide 10 mg iv, and normal saline 2 mL as placebo on the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Often the stimulus used in these experiments was a moving visual field (Farmer et al, 2015; Koch, 1999; Sclocco et al, 2015; Sclocco et al, 2016), which is regularly (but erroneously) referred to as “vection.” Vection is an illusion of self-motion, and studies that utilize moving visual fields to induce motion sickness rarely attempt to validate if the stimulus evokes a perception of self-movement (Lawson et al, 2015). Although some experimental studies in humans used agents such as apomorphine or ipecacuanha to induce nausea (Axelsson et al, 2006; Nussey et al, 1988; Proctor et al, 1978; Rowe et al, 1979), employing moving visual fields has two principal advantages: it is not necessary to administer agents that could produce extraneous side effects and the stimulus can be rapidly terminated at the subject’s request.…”
Section: Prodromal Physiological Changes: Potential Physiological mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Often the stimulus used in these experiments was a moving visual field (Farmer et al, 2015; Koch, 1999; Sclocco et al, 2015; Sclocco et al, 2016), which is regularly (but erroneously) referred to as “vection.” Vection is an illusion of self-motion, and studies that utilize moving visual fields to induce motion sickness rarely attempt to validate if the stimulus evokes a perception of self-movement (Lawson et al, 2015). Although some experimental studies in humans used agents such as apomorphine or ipecacuanha to induce nausea (Axelsson et al, 2006; Nussey et al, 1988; Proctor et al, 1978; Rowe et al, 1979), employing moving visual fields has two principal advantages: it is not necessary to administer agents that could produce extraneous side effects and the stimulus can be rapidly terminated at the subject’s request.…”
Section: Prodromal Physiological Changes: Potential Physiological mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The antiemetic mechanism of action still remains unclear, but previous studies have excluded dopamine-and/or 5HT-3 antagonistic effects [17,18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In humans and in dogs, administration of apomorphine is accompanied by severe nausea and emesis (Lefebvre et al, 1981;Axelsson et al, 2006). In general, mechanisms by which drug-induced emesis can be triggered are diverse.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%