2014
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.28643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Betel quid chewing and the risk of oral and oropharyngeal cancers: A meta‐analysis with implications for cancer control

Abstract: We conducted a random-effects meta-analysis of 50 publications assessing the relationship between oral/oropharyngeal cancer and chewing betel quid, with (BQ1T) or without added tobacco (BQ-T), a common practice in many parts of Asia and globally among Asian immigrants. Exposure-response, by daily amount and years of BQ chewed, was assessed using spline models. Attributable fractions (PAF%) were calculated to estimate the public health impact if BQ were no longer chewed. The meta-relative risk (mRR) for oral/or… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

11
143
2
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
11
143
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Users of betel quid with tobacco have a sevenfold higher risk for developing oral cancer as compared to nonchewers, OR 7.1 [4.5–11.1]. This finding is consistent with findings from the earlier reviews [15, 16]. Similarly, people using other forms of SLT than betel quid with tobacco have an almost five-time higher risk of developing oral cancer as compared to nonchewers, OR 4.7 [3.1–7.1].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Users of betel quid with tobacco have a sevenfold higher risk for developing oral cancer as compared to nonchewers, OR 7.1 [4.5–11.1]. This finding is consistent with findings from the earlier reviews [15, 16]. Similarly, people using other forms of SLT than betel quid with tobacco have an almost five-time higher risk of developing oral cancer as compared to nonchewers, OR 4.7 [3.1–7.1].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The only other Taiwanese study that examined the non-linear relationship between BQ and HNC also reported dose-response curves similar to ours, with risk of oral cancer and pharyngeal cancer increasing sharply from 0 to 15 BQs per day and attenuated after 15 BQs per day [4]. In a meta-analysis by Guha et al ., a dose-response curve similar to ours was observed for studies from India for number of BQ per day and years of BQ chewing, whereas the meta-analysis of studies from Taiwan showed a linear positive association between number of BQ per day and HNC [7]. A limitation of the meta-analysis is that the spline models were built using the reported relative risks based on categorized BQ exposures and not the original data points.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Although BQ is an established risk factor for HNC, current literature has several insufficiencies: 1) most studies did not examine the different types of BQ; 2) many studies did not adjust for potential confounders, including alcohol and cigarette; 3) only a few studies examined the association between BQ and HNC by sites; 4) inadequate data on dose-response; and 5) lack of data on HNC risk after BQ cessation [7]. We conducted a comprehensive analysis to address these insufficiencies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For persons who smoke and drink alcohol daily, the odds ratio are reported to be as high as 35 [12,13]. In Southern Asia the chewing of betel quid and areca nuts explains the high incidence [14,15]. The exposure to various risk factors also has impact on the primary site of OSCC, betel quid and areca nut chewing mainly disposing for tumours arising in the buccal mucosa, while cigarette smoking and alcohol are disposing for tumours in the floor of mouth [1,12,16-18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%