1980
DOI: 10.1063/1.439138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bethe surface and Compton profile of NH3 obtained by 35 keV electron impact

Abstract: Complete inelastic electron impact spectra have been obtained for NH3 for a momentum transfer range from 0.4 to 12.5 a.u. using 35 keV electrons. These spectra were converted to relative generalized oscillator strengths (GOS), were placed onto an absolute scale by the Bethe sum rule, and higher order sum rules were used to test the accuracy of the GOS. The Compton profile (CP) of NH3 was determined from the GOS by means of the impulse approximation (IA) and it was found that the CP’s were asymmetric and shifte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0
4

Year Published

1984
1984
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
10
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Avaldi et al (1987) have used a combination of these methods, integrating the differential cross sections to obtain double differential cross sections for comparison with relative double differential cross sections measured as a function of momentum transfer and normalised by extrapolating to the optical limit. Lahmam-Bennani et al (1987) find very good agreement between the three methods. Ehrhardt et al (1985Ehrhardt et al ( , 1986, Klar et al (1987), open squares: experimental data of Lohmann et al (1984), solid curve: DWBA (this work), long dashes: coupled pseudostate method (Curran and Walters 1987), short dashes: calculation incorporating the exact three·body boundary condition (Brauner et al 1989).…”
Section: Normalisation Of Experimental Cross Sectionssupporting
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Avaldi et al (1987) have used a combination of these methods, integrating the differential cross sections to obtain double differential cross sections for comparison with relative double differential cross sections measured as a function of momentum transfer and normalised by extrapolating to the optical limit. Lahmam-Bennani et al (1987) find very good agreement between the three methods. Ehrhardt et al (1985Ehrhardt et al ( , 1986, Klar et al (1987), open squares: experimental data of Lohmann et al (1984), solid curve: DWBA (this work), long dashes: coupled pseudostate method (Curran and Walters 1987), short dashes: calculation incorporating the exact three·body boundary condition (Brauner et al 1989).…”
Section: Normalisation Of Experimental Cross Sectionssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Both depend to some extent on the validity of the first Born approximation for the double differential cross section. For example Lahmam-Bennani et al (1983) integrate the asymmetric differential cross sections over all directions of the slower electron to estimate the double differential cross section. This is normalised by comparison with measured double differential cross sections put on an absolute scale by using the Bethe sum rule (Lahmam-Bennani et al 1980).…”
Section: Normalisation Of Experimental Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Shell-specific Compton profiles can be derived from the GOS measurements [29][30][31].Bonham and Wellenstein [32] have shown how one can analyze the Compton profile in Bethe surfaces to determine the charge and momentum distributions of the valence-shell electron densities of atoms and molecules. Even though the potential of EELS to provide additional spectroscopic information has been known for years, there has been little examination of nondipole core-excited states and relatively few systematic measurements of the GOS for valence-shell [20,27,33 -40], and particularly inner-shell [1, 41 -45], excitation.…”
Section: K)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in recent years a few groups have started measuring the absolute elastic and inelastic intensities separately. In this regard the work of Lahman-Bennani et al [3] is worth mentioning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%