2022
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2143600/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Better together against genetic effect heterogeneity: a sex-combined interaction analysis of testosterone levels in the UK Biobank data

Abstract: The effect of a genetic variant on a complex trait may differ between female and male, and in the presence of such genetic effect heterogeneity, sex-stratified analysis is often used. For example, genetic effects are sex-specific for testosterone levels, and sex-stratified analysis of testosterone in literature provided easy-to-interpret, sex-specific effect size estimates. However, from the perspective of association testing power, sex-stratified analysis may not be the best approach. As sex-specific genetic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditional XWAS which tests for the primary additive effect, can overlook these variants as effects with varying directions might negate each other in a linear model, leading to the “masking of genetic effect” 108 . Through meta-analysis using Stouffer’s method 111 , we identified variants overlooked in the sex-agnostic XWAS 112 ( Fig. S15 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional XWAS which tests for the primary additive effect, can overlook these variants as effects with varying directions might negate each other in a linear model, leading to the “masking of genetic effect” 108 . Through meta-analysis using Stouffer’s method 111 , we identified variants overlooked in the sex-agnostic XWAS 112 ( Fig. S15 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%