2020
DOI: 10.1177/0899764020927459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Between East and West: Government–Nonprofit Relations in Welfare Provision in Post-Socialist Central Europe

Abstract: This article reviews the main developments in social welfare provision in East Central Europe (ECE), the emergence of nonprofit organizations as welfare providers, and changing nonprofit–government relations in social welfare provision since the early 1990s. In assessing the strengths and weaknesses of nonprofit organization (NPO)–government relations in social welfare provision in ECE, the article suggests that after establishing a firm basis by the mid-2000s, to varying degrees in different countries, nonpro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Far from the immediate post-Soviet period assumptions around the 'inevitable' route to the development of democratic and rule-of-law norms, Hungarian society has been greatly economically (neo)liberalised over the past three decades, while societally it has remained relatively closed. Its civil society sector is made up of numerous local groups that are again increasingly apolitical and focused on activities that are deemed to have minimal political risk, such as sport and leisure (Szalai and Svensson, 2018), as the Orbán government tries to administratively and financially reign in the activities and power of these groups away from politically sensitive subjects (Cox, 2020).…”
Section: Deliberate Dismantling and Authoritarianismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Far from the immediate post-Soviet period assumptions around the 'inevitable' route to the development of democratic and rule-of-law norms, Hungarian society has been greatly economically (neo)liberalised over the past three decades, while societally it has remained relatively closed. Its civil society sector is made up of numerous local groups that are again increasingly apolitical and focused on activities that are deemed to have minimal political risk, such as sport and leisure (Szalai and Svensson, 2018), as the Orbán government tries to administratively and financially reign in the activities and power of these groups away from politically sensitive subjects (Cox, 2020).…”
Section: Deliberate Dismantling and Authoritarianismmentioning
confidence: 99%