This article provides an overview of scholarship on Victorian literature and neuroscience, especially books and articles written in the last ten years. These works tend to fall into one of three categories: literary scholarship that draws on history of science, cognitive literary scholarship, and cognitive literary historicism, which attempts to combine the previous two categories. This essay discusses the strengths and weaknesses of each type of scholarship and the barriers to entry in the field as a whole, such as the interdisciplinary skill set required of authors and readers alike. To offset these obstacles, this essay offers a brief history of Victorian neuroscience, a list of resources for those interested in learning more about the topic, and several useful models for would‐be scholars in this field.