Between Horizontality and Centralisation: Organisational Form and Practice in the Finns Party

Abstract

This article provides the first comprehensive analysis of the Finns Party’s (Perussuomalaiset [PS]) formal organisation and how it operates in practice. Following the framework of this thematic issue, to what extent does the PS’s organisation follow the mass-party model and how centralised is the party in its internal decision-making? Analysis of party documents, association registries, and in-depth interviews with 24 party elite representatives reveal that the PS has developed a complex organisational structure and internal democracy since 2008. However, the power of members in regard to the party’s internal decision-making remains limited, despite the party’s leadership having facilitated a more horizontal and inclusionary organisational culture after 2017. The study reveals how the party combines radically democratic elements of its leadership selection and programme development with a very high level of centralisation of formal power in the party executive, and how the party organisationally relies on a vast and autonomous but heterogeneous network of municipal associations. The article also discusses how PS elites perceive the advantages of having a wide and active organisation characterised by low entry and participation requirements, and how party-adjacent online activism both complements and complicates the functioning of the formal party organisation.

How to reach external citizens? Comparing varieties of transnational party infrastructure

“…Here, research on domestic party organisations could deliver important insights. Recent studies show that populist radical right parties are prone to maintain mass organisations, which include a centralised organisation, formal infrastructure, strong rootedness on the ground and close connections with the grassroots (Favero 2021;Hatakka 2021;Sijstermans 2021;Zulianello 2021). Considering these findings, H2 argues the following: H2 Populist parties are more likely to maintain a high level of physical party infrastructure abroad with formal rules and rights for non-resident party members.…”

The nightless nights of the ‘Nazi camp’: The Finnish far-right’s anti-climate politics in urban space

“…In recent decades, the Finnish far-right environment has transformed in many ways, following the ideas of the globally surging radical right and due to the growing influence of the Finns Party (perussuomalaiset), formerly known as the True Finns Party, which broke through in the national parliamentary elections of 2011 and since then has been among the three biggest parties in national elections (e.g. Hatakka 2021). The banning of the Finnish chapter of the neo-Nazi Nordic Resistance Movement (NRM) in 2020, due to its members' long history of violent attacks, has led to the degradation of organizational activities (Kotonen 2021) and overall to the fragmentation of the Finnish far-right environment.…”

Can a change in the leadership of a populist radical right party be traced among voters? The case of the Finns Party

“…The defectors also included all the party's ministers who were part of a bourgeois coalition government from 2015 to 2019. Blue Reform, the splinter party, failed to win any seats in the next election, while the Finns Party recovered and eventually managed to both increase its membership numbers and win 17.5 of the popular vote in 2019 (Hatakka, 2021). After the leadership change, the Finns Party was perceived to more clearly voice an anti-immigration discourse and demand stricter immigration policies.…”