Between love and boycott: a story of dual origin brands

Abstract

Purpose This research aims to address ethnocentric consumers’ willingness to boycott dual origin brands, in the particular case of national brands linked to a very specific regional origin, through analysing the paradox of (unfavourable) regional ethnocentrism versus (favourable) consumer–brand relationship (i.e. brand identification, trust and love) on consumers’ decision to buy or boycott those brands in that circumstances. Building on social identity and cognitive dissonance theories, this study aims to examine the Spanish consumer relationship with national brands originated in Catalonia considering the current conflicting circumstances in the region. Design/methodology/approach The authors collected data by means of personal questionnaires, distributed among 277 Spanish consumers of Catalan brands of Cava. The data is analysed by using structural equation modelling and linear structural relations. Findings After controlling for brand familiarity, the results of this study reveal that ethnocentrism negatively distorts consumers’ confidence in dual origin brands and highlight the role of identification and trust as brand love antecedents. It also reveals that ethnocentrism has a more profound impact on boycotting decision than brand love. Originality/value This study is one of the few to capture the puzzlement created by the paradoxical nature of the brand’s duality of origin. Furthermore, it contributes to the marketing literature by examining the impact of ethnocentrism on two relationship variables (i.e. identification and trust) and exploring their joint impact on consumers’ decision to buy or boycott. The findings of this study can be helpful for companies facing boycotting behaviour triggered by ethnocentric consumer reaction towards dual origin brands.

The interplay of app characteristics and smartphone addiction in mobile shopping behaviour

“…Moreover, perceived reputation prolongs users' time with the retail channel and enhances their connection (Iqbal et al, 2021; Sahay & Sharma, 2010). Based on the retailer's role in the mobile channel, customers create a precise association and identification that effectively shapes their smartphone usage tendency (Abdelwahab et al, 2020; Erdem et al, 2006; Stokburger‐Sauer et al, 2012). Therefore, customers' positive experience with a retailer does go on to contribute to a psychological attachment to the context (Iqbal et al, 2021).…”

Influencers and brands successful collaborations: A mutual reinforcement to promote products and services on social media

“…However, the prestige of brands does not influence all consumers in the same way. Specifically, consumers with greater public awareness are more conscious of the image they transmit to others and acquire prestigious brands to use them publicly and communicate an image of themselves that accords with their ideal image (Abdelwahab et al, 2020). However, people who have higher personal awareness, and are more focused on their own feelings and perceptions, buy prestige brands because they generate in them pleasant experiences or resolve problems particularly well (Fennell 1978), or they want to associate themselves personally with the brand's quality and prestige as reinforcement of their self-concept (Graeff 1997).…”

Sense of online betrayal, brand hate, and outrage customers’ anti-brand activism

“…Moreover, Fetscherin (2019) proved the significant influence of brand hate on public complaining. and even boycott by the consumer community (Abdelwahab et al, 2020). Customers choose boycotts as a proactive response to revenge the betraying firms and demand compensation for their feeling of loss and value deficits (Hahn & Albert, 2017…”