Between Promising Advances and Deepening Concerns: A Bottom-Up Review of Trends in Land Governance 2015–2018

Abstract

An evolving land governance context compounds the case for practitioners to closely track developments as they unfold. While much research sheds light on key trends, questions remain about approaches for collective bottom-up analysis led by land governance practitioners themselves. This study presents findings from an initiative to test such an approach. Drawing on written submissions made in response to an open call for contributions, the study discusses global trends in land governance over the period 2015–2018. While not a comprehensive review nor a replacement for empirically grounded research, the study highlights some of the developments practitioners grapple with in their work. The findings point to the contrasting local-to-global trends that affect land governance in diverse agro-ecological and socio-economic settings: Growing commercial pressures on land, and shrinking spaces for dissent in many contexts, coexist with new avenues for public participation in land governance processes; while diverse approaches to securing land rights, whether individual or collective, possibly underpinned by new deployments of digital technology, can coexist or compete for policy traction within the same polity. This bottom-up trends analysis broadly correlates with available accounts based on empirical research, while also providing distinctive emphases that reflect the ways practitioners perceive the changing realities they are engaged with.

History and Prospects for African Land Governance: Institutions, Technology and ‘Land Rights for All’

“…Dysfunctional national land laws and administration are increasingly seen as a major economic obstacle to African development. African land governance may now be at a critical juncture (in path-dependency terms), because the demographic youth bulge puts new demands upon the governing class, while existential threats grow [157,158].…”

Socio-Economic and Environmental Implications of Bioenergy Crop Cultivation on Marginal African Drylands and Key Principles for a Sustainable Development

“…To illustrate the dimensions of LSLA, in 2009 the land requests in Mozambique exceeded 20 million ha for biofuels, such as sugarcane and Jatropha, not specified by which stakeholder, which is equivalent to two-thirds of the total arable land in the country [50]. The size of a single acquisition is also increasing, e.g., a documented allocation of 452,500 ha biofuel projects in Madagascar [51]. While these are predominantly areas in rainfed/pluvial climates, with increasing pressure on land use types, it does not seem impossible that such large areas could also be associated with MADs in the future.…”

“…The circumstances in which these deals are closed are often shady, and contracts tend to be short and simple compared to the economic reality of the transaction [51]. Deals lack the disclosure of even basic data (e.g., size, nature, and location); they are not transparent, non-consultative, and corrupt [18,49,52].…”

Large-scale land and water acquisitions: What implications for food security?

“…Urbanisation not only entails the expansion of big cities, but also the concentration of people into smaller towns, where schools and health services, water and communications are more readily available. It is often associated with the spread of unregulated land markets and land speculators (Cotula, Anseeuw and Baldinelli, 2019).…”