1995
DOI: 10.1002/pf.41219951007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Between the lines: Intricacies of major donor communication

Abstract: Donors assent to fundraising requests and change their minds. Donors decline well‐thought‐out and clearly articulated requests. It is useful to follow some of the internal emotional and intellectual processes that underlie donors' reactions to fundraisers' behaviors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Social desirability is conceived as pertaining to how a subject presents himself or herself and their actions, affecting the data that are collected for analysis. A fundraiser's interpersonal skills are an important asset to their professional ability (e.g., Alborough, 2017/2021; Herrero & Kraemer, 2020; Lindahl, 2010; Tobin, 1995). Their ability to participate in what Goffman (1967) terms the interaction rituals that set people at ease also help fundraisers to set positive impressions, frame situations to support cooperation, and gauge the likely reaction of those with whom they meet (Hansen, 2022).…”
Section: Interpretive Approaches In Practice: Two Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social desirability is conceived as pertaining to how a subject presents himself or herself and their actions, affecting the data that are collected for analysis. A fundraiser's interpersonal skills are an important asset to their professional ability (e.g., Alborough, 2017/2021; Herrero & Kraemer, 2020; Lindahl, 2010; Tobin, 1995). Their ability to participate in what Goffman (1967) terms the interaction rituals that set people at ease also help fundraisers to set positive impressions, frame situations to support cooperation, and gauge the likely reaction of those with whom they meet (Hansen, 2022).…”
Section: Interpretive Approaches In Practice: Two Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the impression portrayed is positive, subsequent fundraising costs are not judged rigorously. Negative information forms a greater demand for further reports on fundraising expenses but does not cause donation decline (Tobin, 1995).…”
Section: Literature Review and Propositions Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with Tobin (1995), donors want to fully understand the direct connection between their donations and a specific programme and do not consider fundraising costs to be a reason for not donating. They are more probable to assess efficiency for several other reasons, for example, quality of services provided, general perceptions of the organisation and the professional staff (Tobin, 1995). If the impression portrayed is positive, subsequent fundraising costs are not judged rigorously.…”
Section: Literature Review and Propositions Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%