2022
DOI: 10.24203/ajhss.v10i3.6953
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Between Tolerance and Exclusionism: Urban Iranian Youth’s Attitudes towards Race and Religion

Abstract: Although the resurgence of race and religiosity among Iranians predates the past millennium, it was not until beginning of twentieth century that both religion and race entered the public discourse, gradually becoming the key constituents of Iranian identity. The emergence of the non-conformist young generation in early 1990s, however, raises important questions about the critical role of race and religion in shaping Iranian youth’s identities. With a specific attention to the most mature (25-29 years old) seg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scapegoating and blaming foreign (often Western) enemies have been a political strategy used by the Iranian state since 1979. The notion of 'the enemy [of the Islamic state]' has often been used by Iranian authorities as a politically motivated rhetorical strategy to influence and unite the masses against the threats from several imagined, ill-defined, and shifting adversarial forces to scapegoat and distract the public from the country's numerous distressing social problems, which are precisely rooted in the totalitarian nature of the theocratic government [38].…”
Section: Himpathy In Official Reactions and In Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scapegoating and blaming foreign (often Western) enemies have been a political strategy used by the Iranian state since 1979. The notion of 'the enemy [of the Islamic state]' has often been used by Iranian authorities as a politically motivated rhetorical strategy to influence and unite the masses against the threats from several imagined, ill-defined, and shifting adversarial forces to scapegoat and distract the public from the country's numerous distressing social problems, which are precisely rooted in the totalitarian nature of the theocratic government [38].…”
Section: Himpathy In Official Reactions and In Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%