“…With all that said, our results cannot rule out the possibility of simultaneous selfrepresentation altogether. Future work could explore whether multiple self-allocation might be elicited depending on other factors, including (i) cultural differences in independent versus interdependent self-orientation (Geertz, 1975;Grossmann & Na, 2014); (ii) individual differences in self-complexity (Linville, 1987;Rafaeli-Mor, Gotlib, & Revelle, 1999), a composite measure of the number of selves one identifies with and the features they share in common; (iii) individual difference in relative self-importance, the relative importance one places on different self-concepts (Brown et al, 2016;Sanz-Vergel, Demerouti, Bakker, & Moreno-Jiménez, 2011); and (iv) intersectional identities, whether one typically manages multiple self-concepts that are especially salient, as is common in transgender individuals and black women (De Vries, 2012;Reid & Comas-Diaz, 1990). Future work could also try splitting the self-relevance task across the visual hemifields, given that performance on other high-level tasks such as attentive tracking improves when items are divided across the hemifields, suggesting that each brain hemisphere has separate cognitive resources to devote to the items in its corresponding hemifield (Alvarez & Cavanagh, 2005;Sperry, Gazzaniga, & Bogen, 1969).…”