2018
DOI: 10.21037/jeccm.2018.05.02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beware of broad-spectrum generalizations: ceftazidime-avibactam compared to meropenem for the treatment of gram-negative pneumonia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients who are at highest risk of being infected by resistant pathogens are often excluded from these trials. 22 By permitting the use of best available therapy as a comparator in an open-label study design in different geographical locations, this study could directly assess the efficacy and safety of cefiderocol in patients with evidence of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative infections caused by any Gram-negative pathogen, including Acinetobacter spp. 18 Thus, patients were enrolled irrespective of infection type, comorbidities, pathogen species, or carbapenem resistance mechanism, resulting in a heterogeneous patient population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients who are at highest risk of being infected by resistant pathogens are often excluded from these trials. 22 By permitting the use of best available therapy as a comparator in an open-label study design in different geographical locations, this study could directly assess the efficacy and safety of cefiderocol in patients with evidence of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative infections caused by any Gram-negative pathogen, including Acinetobacter spp. 18 Thus, patients were enrolled irrespective of infection type, comorbidities, pathogen species, or carbapenem resistance mechanism, resulting in a heterogeneous patient population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All-cause fatality rates seemed to be 8% and 7% in the C/A and meropenem groups, respectively (25). This registration study has also placed some dubiousness about safety in the C/A group compared to meropenem, with reported higher rates of serious adverse reactions (19% vs. 13%) and adverse events leading to study drug discontinuation (4% vs. 2.7%) (132)(133)(134).…”
Section: Clinical Trials For C/a In Pneumoniamentioning
confidence: 92%
“…IV over 2 h) plus meropenem placebo or meropenem 1 g (q8h IV over 30 minutes) plus C/A placebo for 7 to 14 days (25). Additionally, from randomization, openlabel aminoglycosides, and linezolid or vancomycin were permitted while awaiting culture results for 24 to 72 h (25,(132)(133)(134). The primary endpoint in this study was clinical cure at the TOC visit with additional secondary endpoints, including all-cause 28-day mortality (25).…”
Section: Clinical Trials For C/a In Pneumoniamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ceftazidime/avibactam was shown to be non-inferior to meropenem in a recent large randomized controlled trial of non-CRE pneumonia 33 . Meropenem itself has been used as a comparator agent in many pneumonia studies, and vaborbactam achieves high epithelial lining fluid concentrations 34 . In contrast, in the absence of confirmatory data, plazomicin should not be considered a first-line choice for monotherapy of CRE pneumonia.…”
Section: Multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceaementioning
confidence: 99%