2014
DOI: 10.1111/anae.12828
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beware the Boojum: the NAP5 audit of accidental awareness during intended general anaesthesia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, the 5th National Audit Project (NAP5) demonstrated an overall incidence of ~1:19,000 anaesthetics . The disparity between results and methodologies used has been extensively discussed, with Avidan and Sleigh commenting in an editorial that NAP5 ‘was reliant on sampling from the population of all GA survivors from 1946 to the present, who had not previously reported any intra‐operative recall, and who had also chanced to be exposed to the investigation team’ . Importantly, the associated NAP5 Activity Survey reported that only 2.8% of all general anaesthetics involved depth of anaesthesia (DOA) monitoring in the UK .…”
Section: Aaga Without Recallmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, the 5th National Audit Project (NAP5) demonstrated an overall incidence of ~1:19,000 anaesthetics . The disparity between results and methodologies used has been extensively discussed, with Avidan and Sleigh commenting in an editorial that NAP5 ‘was reliant on sampling from the population of all GA survivors from 1946 to the present, who had not previously reported any intra‐operative recall, and who had also chanced to be exposed to the investigation team’ . Importantly, the associated NAP5 Activity Survey reported that only 2.8% of all general anaesthetics involved depth of anaesthesia (DOA) monitoring in the UK .…”
Section: Aaga Without Recallmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimated incidence of spontaneous reports of awareness in the UK in the NAP5 study was 1:15 000 in the baseline survey and 1:19 000 in the main study , remarkably less than in the formal studies with a Brice interview . The possible reasons for this have been addressed elsewhere , and it is important to stress that NAP5 does not provide a definitive incidence of unintended awareness during cardiothoracic anaesthesia. The NAP5 project received five or four spontaneous reports of unintended awareness during cardiac anaesthesia, depending on whether one reads Chapter 11 or Chapter 14, and four reports during thoracic anaesthesia (Table ).…”
Section: Impact Of Nap5mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The estimated incidence of spontaneous reports of awareness in the UK in the NAP5 study was 1:15 000 in the baseline survey [26] and 1:19 000 in the main study [5], remarkably less than in the formal studies with a Brice interview [2,16]. The possible reasons for this have been addressed elsewhere [27,28], and it is important to stress that NAP5 does not provide a definitive incidence of unintended awareness during cardiothoracic anaesthesia. The NAP5 project received five or four spontaneous reports of unintended awareness during cardiac anaesthesia, depending on whether one reads Chapter 11 or Chapter 14, and four reports during thoracic anaesthesia (Table 2).…”
Section: Impact Of Nap5mentioning
confidence: 96%