2019
DOI: 10.14744/bej.2019.00710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyoglu Eye J. Ahead of Print: BEJ-00710 | DOI: 10.14744/bej.2019.00710 Ciliary sulcus implantation of Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) in patients with corneal decompensation risk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…None of our patients developed postoperative corneal decompensation. This is an important finding because previous studies have attested to decreased likelihood of corneal decompensation with ciliary sulcus or PP siting compared to AC siting [36][37][38][39]. Imamoglu et al [37] showed a low risk of corneal decompensation (4.3%) due to posterior AGV implantation in the ciliary sulcus.…”
Section: Faghihi Et Al (2007) [24]mentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…None of our patients developed postoperative corneal decompensation. This is an important finding because previous studies have attested to decreased likelihood of corneal decompensation with ciliary sulcus or PP siting compared to AC siting [36][37][38][39]. Imamoglu et al [37] showed a low risk of corneal decompensation (4.3%) due to posterior AGV implantation in the ciliary sulcus.…”
Section: Faghihi Et Al (2007) [24]mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…This is an important finding because previous studies have attested to decreased likelihood of corneal decompensation with ciliary sulcus or PP siting compared to AC siting [ 36 - 39 ]. Imamoglu et al [ 37 ] showed a low risk of corneal decompensation (4.3%) due to posterior AGV implantation in the ciliary sulcus. They advocated that as a good option for patients at risk of corneal decompensation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study found that sulcus tube implantation was safe in pseudophakic eyes with a high risk of corneal decompensation, although there was a high incidence of postoperative hyphema 44 . Although these studies present contradictory results, most studies show that hyphema is more common with sulcus tube implantation, compared with anterior chamber or pars plana implantation, likely attributable to the greater vascularization of the ciliary sulcus 45–47 . The hyphema tends to be mild in nature and typically self-resolves without additional intervention 45,47 .…”
Section: Complications Of Glaucoma Tube Shunt Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…44 Although these studies present contradictory results, most studies show that hyphema is more common with sulcus tube implantation, compared with anterior chamber or pars plana implantation, likely attributable to the greater vascularization of the ciliary sulcus. [45][46][47] The hyphema tends to be mild in nature and typically self-resolves without additional intervention. 45,47 Pars plana tube insertions have also proven to have similar safety and efficacy profiles compared with the anterior chamber and sulcus insertions and may be even more effective than both alternatives in lowering postoperative medication burden.…”
Section: Complications Of Glaucoma Tube Shunt Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%