2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.psym.2012.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond Capacity: Identifying Ethical Dilemmas Underlying Capacity Evaluation Requests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the literature suggests that mental capacity assessments were unlawfully carried out when there were no diagnosed impairment of the mind or brain and no reason to doubt capacity and occurred when people labeled as "a difficult patient" were perceived by others as making unwise decisions with an element of risk attached. 1,11,12 Whereas under the new legislation, if a person does meet the diagnostic threshold of the MCA, the health care professional will initiate the functional element of the assessment, which requires a person to be able to understand the decision, which is to be made, weighs up the risks and benefits, retains this information, and communicates a decision. If a person is unable to do one or more of these tasks, they would be considered to be lacking the mental capacity to make the decision for which they have been assessed.…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the literature suggests that mental capacity assessments were unlawfully carried out when there were no diagnosed impairment of the mind or brain and no reason to doubt capacity and occurred when people labeled as "a difficult patient" were perceived by others as making unwise decisions with an element of risk attached. 1,11,12 Whereas under the new legislation, if a person does meet the diagnostic threshold of the MCA, the health care professional will initiate the functional element of the assessment, which requires a person to be able to understand the decision, which is to be made, weighs up the risks and benefits, retains this information, and communicates a decision. If a person is unable to do one or more of these tasks, they would be considered to be lacking the mental capacity to make the decision for which they have been assessed.…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35,36,9 There are distinctions between coercion, pressure, 37 persuasion, and advice, which cover a lot of relational territory and exist on a continuum of permissibility that varies with the clinical situation. 38 Because patients are considered competent until proven otherwise, persuasion and advice may not be unduly coercive, even when incapacity is suspected.…”
Section: Accessing Capacitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…41,53 Medical beneficence is sometimes equated with minimizing risk and maximizing longevity; in this framework, any treatment refusal can seem irrational. 9 However, these are not every person's highest values, nor always unconditional ones for a given patient. In the end, "health is only one value among many."…”
Section: Noncognitive Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…That may still be in the future for many hospitals, but now is an appropriate time to prepare. 22 My final suggestions for hospital attorneys would be to encourage the use of a clinical ethics consultation service if the hospital has one. And if it is not used often, or not highly regarded, then support adding (and supporting) a better trained service, so they can be available for some of these cases where now psychiatry may be called but is not of much use through no fault of their own -it is unfair for psychiatry to be expected to be a surreptitious ethics program.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%