Beyond Content: Cultural Perspectives on Using the Internet to Deliver a Sexual Health Intervention to American Indian Youth

Abstract

American Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN) youth are characterized by high rates of pregnancy and risky sexual behavior. Reaching these youth with culturally appropriate interventions is difficult due to geographic dispersion and cultural isolation. Online interventions can provide opportunities for reaching and engaging AIAN youth. However, electronic interventions are also impersonal and this can be culturally incongruous for AIANs and other populations for whom traditional ceremonies, practices and patterns of interpersonal communication are central. This paper describes the application of community based participatory research methods to: (1) identify concerns about the exclusive use of an online sexual health program; (2) address community concerns by developing supplemental class lessons, and (3) evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the new hybrid intervention. Data derives from qualitative and quantitative sources. During the formative phase of the project, qualitative data from partner interactions was analyzed with participatory inquiry to inform intervention development. To evaluate the intervention, qualitative data (e.g., interviews, surveys) were used to understand and explain quantitative measures such as implementation fidelity and attendance. Implementers were enthusiastic about the hybrid intervention. The lessons were easy to teach and provided opportunities for meaningful discussions, adaptations, and community involvement. The use of online videos was an effective method for providing training. Working with community partners, we resolved cultural concerns arising from the exclusive use of the Internet by creating a hybrid intervention. The additional burden for staff to deliver the class lessons was considered minimal in comparison to the educational and programmatic benefits of the hybrid intervention. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01698073.

The relationship between the living lab approach and successful implementation of healthcare innovations: an integrative review

“…Studies were conducted in 12 different countries. Most studies were conducted in the USA (N=7),40–46 the UK (N=6)47–52 or Canada (N=5) 53–57. The majority of studies applied a mixed-methods study design (N=10)42–46 51 53 55 56 58 or a qualitative study design (N=6) 48 52 54 57 59 60.…”

“…Most studies were conducted in the USA (N=7),40–46 the UK (N=6)47–52 or Canada (N=5) 53–57. The majority of studies applied a mixed-methods study design (N=10)42–46 51 53 55 56 58 or a qualitative study design (N=6) 48 52 54 57 59 60. For eliciting the stakeholder type, categorisation to sum up the stakeholder types was used 61.…”

Barriers, frameworks, and mitigating strategies influencing the dissemination and implementation of health promotion interventions in indigenous communities: a scoping review

“…Staff training, personalized technical assistance, staff commitment to engage youth, and continuous evaluation of staff performance [ 8 , 10 , 12 , 17 , 23 – 25 , 29 , 30 ] are necessary for sustained implementation of programs within Indigenous communities. These strategies can mitigate the “Personnel Challenges and High Turnover” that was cited in 65% of the studies [ 13 – 16 , 18 , 20 – 23 , 25 , 32 ].…”

Creating a path forward: understanding the context of sexual health and sexually transmitted infections in American Indian/Alaska Native populations – a review

“…115 Many interventions carry out formative research with their intended audience to guide program design, using CBPR methods to root sexual health teachings with traditional ways of learning, knowing, and sharing. [116][117][118][119][120][121][122][123][124][125][126][127][128][129][130][131] Robust research methods have been used to assess interventions impact and efficacy, focusing primarily on adolescents and young adults. [132][133][134][135] This work has generated a growing body of curricula and behavioural interventions that meet tribal, state, and federal criteria for use in school and community settings.…”