Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Smart Cities and Green ICT Systems 2016
DOI: 10.5220/0005764904170424
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond CPU: Considering Memory Power Consumption of Software

Abstract: Abstract:ICTs (Information and Communication Technologies) are responsible around 2% of worldwide greenhouse gas emissions (Gartner, 2007). And according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPPC) recent reports, CO2 emissions due to ICTs are increasing widely. For this reason, many works tried to propose various tools to estimate the energy consumption due to software in order to reduce carbon footprint. However, these studies, in the majority of cases, takes into account only the CPU and neglect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If we assume that the electrical power consumed by the memory component of our device is 5% of that consumed by the processor (Acar et al, 2016), then the JANET will consume approximately 0.95 × 5 6 + 0.05 × 0.5 = 0.817 of the electrical power consumed by the LSTM. However, this ratio is a theoretical estimation and would be different in practice.…”
Section: Theoretic Computational Benefitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we assume that the electrical power consumed by the memory component of our device is 5% of that consumed by the processor (Acar et al, 2016), then the JANET will consume approximately 0.95 × 5 6 + 0.05 × 0.5 = 0.817 of the electrical power consumed by the LSTM. However, this ratio is a theoretical estimation and would be different in practice.…”
Section: Theoretic Computational Benefitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the pyRAPL module, the indirect method is used in this experiment. In systems, CPUs have predominantly been seen to be the most power-hungry component (Acar et al, 2016;Salem, 2017). As a result, the focus was on determining the CPU's energy usage while executing the algorithms.…”
Section: Overhead Performance Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of memory capacity of the sub-millimeter node, the current advances allow expecting a memory size of about a few dozens of MB [38]. On the other hand, the memory size impacts on the energy consumption of the nanonode (activation, pre-charging, refreshing, read, write) [39]. The consumption level of each of these tasks depends on the type of memory (DRAM, SRAM, etc.).…”
Section: Memory Capacity At Sub-millimeter Scalementioning
confidence: 99%